Posted on 10/12/2011 7:47:03 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Although I fell in love with Sarah Palin in 2008, she had begun to drive me a just a little bit crazy recently, often so inarticulate that I thought she was trying to make Barack Obama without a teleprompter look like Pericles.
All is forgiven. Sarah Palins decision not to run for president redeemed her. She did the right thing by her country, her party, and by herself. By not running, Palin preserves her status as a power broker in the Republican Party, which could have been diminished by a bad showing in the primaries. She will be big in 2012, bigger than if she'd launched a failed presidential bid.
In considering the career of Sarah Palin, up to this point, I am going to use a word I generally consider verboten: sexism. It is generally liberals who toss around the sexism charge, but it is worth asking whether, if she had been a man, Palin would have been treated as abominably by the liberal media.
In 2008, we had a man running for the presidency of the United States who was a virtual unknown, yet the media was in Alaska, rummaging through Palins trash. Some of the speculation about Palin and her family was downright bizarreDaily Beast blogger Andrew Sullivan became fixated on whether son Trig was really Palins (Sullivan posited that Trig was her grandson).
It should be noted that Palin especially upset liberal women. One of my Georgetown liberal friends and I agreed that we just shouldnt talk about her. Fine with me, but my friend called with daily bulletins. An itch that had to be scratched, Palin was criticized by my friend for having had that pathetic baby, a particularly brutal reference to Trig, who has Down syndrome. Yes, Sarah got my friends goat.
But was it sexism? Only in the sense that conservative women face a kind of hostility that is the result of a combination of their sex and their philosophy. Women are supposed to be liberals. You will be punished by the media if you wander off the reservation. But I dont think this response is fueled by sexism per se as much as it is by something arguably worse: the idea that women are owned by one political party. African-Americans often face the same prejudice.
But I am ready to concede that pure sexism, sexism not based on political philosophy, does exist outside the fringes of society. Ironically, the one instance of this weve seen lately comes from what should be an unlikely place: the Obama White House. Ron Suskinds new book, Confidence Men: Wall Street, Washington, and the Education of a President, quotes women whod worked early on in the administration alleging sexism. I'm afraid it sounds plausible.
[T]his place would be in court for a hostile workplace ... Because it actually fit all of the classic legal requirements for a genuinely hostile workplace to women," Anita Dunn, former Obama communications director, is quoted saying.
I think the real story here may be that supposedly feminist men often dont treat women well. Jean Paul Sartre was famous for (figuratively) walking all over feminist icon Simone de Beauvoir, while Dashiell Hammett also treated Lillian Hellman like a human doormat. Its enough to make you yearn for an old-fashioned male chauvinist pig wholl stand when you enter the room and refrain from sleeping with your friends!
In the case of Obama & Co., the guys probably felt they had good feminist creds because they were advancing policies designed to curry favor with female voters. These are always big government policies that assume that women are victims of discrimination, even if most of the discrimination we see these days hurts men more. Sarah Palin's offense, the thing that made her so infuriating to liberal women, was that she didnt buy into this. She believes in small government and personal responsibility. This made her a target. You arent supposed to believe these things, Ms. Palin.
It should be said that Palin made the mistake of playing into the media's hands. She appeared on Saturday Night Live, dignifying Tina Feys imitations of her. On the other hand, she engaged in an ongoing feud with what she called the lamestream media. A little aloofness would not have come amiss (though I can't help feeling that that's just not our Sarah). She became a celebrity rather than a governor, giving up her day job on flimsy pretexts (though it may truly be that she had to leave the governors office because the number of ethics inquiries filed against her spelled financial ruin if she didn't start making big money).
Some have suggested that Palin take courses and learn more about history and policy (I am picturing her as Meg Ryan in I.Q.). I dont see that happening. She is a gut politician. But she could bone up some and learn not to get down on the medias level. She was probably plucked prematurely from Alaska, but that cant be remedied.
What is undeniable is that, because she was smart enough not to run, she has a great future. Her analysis of what is at stake in 2012 is on target (oops! Is it okay to say that?):
We cannot afford this fundamental transformation of America, turning it into something that we don't even recognize. Instead, we need to restore this country. We need to restore all that is good, and right and free about America. Our republic is worth defending. We do not need a transformation, we need a renewal. We need a restoration of America.
Could anybody have said it better?
Sarah Palin is one smart gal.
Leaders lead, Palin is not a leader.
You guys must not be married. She’s a woman. She can still change her mind. It’s her prerogative.
;-)
100% agree. Anyone calling Trig “that pathetic baby” would no longer be my friend. Period.
????? I thought she was the uber-Reagan?
Remind me which state you were governor of and which major political party made you their vice presidential candidate?
Lipstick wearing Uber-Reagan pit bull grizzly cheesecake eye-candy mom with cojones.
Cain (I hope he is reading) is like a bridge that unites old guard Republicans and tea party Republicans.
Thats how you win the 2012 election. If a candidate can unite the two, he has a very good chance at turning this into a 1988-like electoral landslide.
Did she want to see any members of her family assassinated? No. And neither would I. I think this was the bottom line. Her parents ended up sleeping with guns and had FBI protection. Her first responsibility is to her family.
This is a corrupt country.
We probably wouldn’t control the House without her and the Tea Party.
LOL. Well put. Sad but true.
>> feminist men often dont treat women well.
>> Its enough to make you yearn for an old-fashioned male chauvinist pig
Bitter?
We knew she was never running.
Her family talked her out of it.
Exactly, Can anyone see Romney talking to a Tea Party rally. On one days notice she had over thousand people in NH. Romney had about 50 on the same day. The GOP is dead.
Yes, three days after the ‘Undefeated’ DVD went on sales in stores. Good timing.
The bright side is this decision and the last one to quit in Alaska STILL leaves her ‘undefeated’
What this “author” is actually saying, in a nutshell, is: “Sarah Palin is no threat anymore — therefor I NOW approve of her.”
Talked her out of running for the Republican nomination. Think about it. Todd is an independent.
And also in the kitchen, right? And maybe she can help with the Convention decorations and balloons and such?
When abouts do you think this happened?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.