Posted on 10/11/2011 8:14:36 PM PDT by quantim
“Good democrats?”
That's clearly AP's "talking-point." Perry was much improved this debate but he was clearly not treated like Romney's chief rival. He was treated like an also-ran. The bulk of the time went to Romney and Cain.
In context, there’s nothing wrong with what Romney said. He essentially said he can work with people who love their country more than their party. He’s stealing Obama’s “party before country” schtick which Obama stole from McCain.
Of course he can, because he is one.
“I dont think Romney wold do us any good even on USSC nominations.”
Very good point. Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsberg, and Breyer are all in their 70’s. There could be several retirements in the next 5 years. If a President Romney “compromised” with the Democrats on a replacement for Scalia or Kennedy, the Court swings to the left forever. Once they get a 5-4 leftist majority on the Court, the Democrats will fight to the death to hold it.
Hey Mitt knowing how you Flip Flop on every issue conservatives care about,Explain how you would Compromise with the Devil to get along,You just want to work with him,explain to me how you teach your children to work with the Devil,after all you just want to get along
Cain looks like he'll be the Tea Party candidate. Perry looked looked tired and disengaged. He might have the money, but he doesn't have the energy.
Which is why Willard has no business being the republican candidate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.