Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Tea Party Over?
New York Times ^ | 10/9/11 | Bill Keller

Posted on 10/09/2011 7:25:05 PM PDT by DRey

The latest Fox poll offered Republican voters a menu of 11 candidates and found...not only were voters scattered across the conservative landscape, but 1/4 of the Tea Party adherents sampled were still “not impressed” with anyone. It’s hard to impress a movement that only knows what it is against. Now, barring some wild twist of fate, there are two men standing: Mitt Romney, the methodical, thrill-free, ideologically elastic technocrat from Massachusetts, who has made himself the default nominee; and the last hope of the hard core, the Not Mitt: Rick Perry.

snip

...whatever you think of his deviations from Tea Party purity, they make some sense in the context of Texas. His decision to let children of illegal immigrants attend state colleges at the in-state tuition rate, which so scandalizes the zero-tolerance conservatives, is conventional bipartisan pragmatism in Texas. The logic is: if the federal government can’t keep illegals out, it’s not our fault, but we can at least steer them away from the welfare rolls or jails and into productive lives.

snip

In this race, Rick Perry is the Tea Party’s dream candidate, the one remaining figure who could translate a noisy backlash into serious power. If Rick Perry loses, the Tea Party will have missed the opportunity of a lifetime. If he wins, Perry being Perry, it’s not entirely clear whether he will appease its members, but my guess is he’ll try. “Rick Perry is the only candidate who would actually close down a cabinet department,” one longtime admirer told me, when I asked whether a President Perry would disappoint the Tea Party. “You would see a very happy base — at least for the first term.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: newyorkslimes; nyslimes; occupywallstreet; perry; projection; romney; silentmajority; teaparty; wehavejobs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: DRey

What a bad flashback. Molly Ivins was a real POS.


61 posted on 10/09/2011 9:06:44 PM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DRey

What a bad flashback. Molly Ivins was a real POS.


62 posted on 10/09/2011 9:06:56 PM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40
Using the New York Times to push RINO Rick? LMAO!!

I think you missed the point of the post.
63 posted on 10/09/2011 9:11:54 PM PDT by DRey (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DRey
ideologically elastic

translates to "without principals".

64 posted on 10/09/2011 9:12:19 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Exactly! Cain would be great, Perry acceptable and hopefully a true states rights federalist. Even if (God forbid) Romney becomes president, he'll be kept in check by a conservative Congress and by conservative State legislatures. Mitt wouldn't have the guts to advance dumb programs or to veto major permanent tax cuts proposed by Congress.

The 2010 midterms were just the beginning. The Lamestream media are running scared, and now Sarah doesn't have to worry about defending her positions, she's free to unload on them and their blatant bias.

65 posted on 10/09/2011 9:13:20 PM PDT by rfp1234 (RFP's Law: Whoever blames Bush first shall lose the argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DRey

I’ve missed nothing. Your support of liberal Rick Perry is completely transparent as is your desperation in knowing he has less chance of becoming the Republican nominee with each passing day.


66 posted on 10/09/2011 9:15:15 PM PDT by South40 (Reject the pro-ILLEGAL candidate. Vote conservative -- vote for Herman Cain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioman


BOO!!
67 posted on 10/09/2011 9:17:26 PM PDT by DRey (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

Romney is not an option.


68 posted on 10/09/2011 9:18:38 PM PDT by DRey (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: South40

Lol. You’re silly.


69 posted on 10/09/2011 9:19:22 PM PDT by DRey (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DRey
Thanks.

You're obvious.

70 posted on 10/09/2011 9:21:07 PM PDT by South40 (Reject the pro-ILLEGAL candidate. Vote conservative -- vote for Herman Cain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: South40

I didn’t write the article, South...or the headline.


71 posted on 10/09/2011 9:22:07 PM PDT by DRey (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Right. Wishful thinking from the Slimes. The Silent Majority will be there when there's a "there" there.
72 posted on 10/09/2011 9:23:45 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DRey
lol! Do I really need to explain this to you? Really?

Firstly, I know you did not 'write the article'. But you posted it because you like what it said. Example" In this race, Rick Perry is the Tea Party’s dream candidate, the one remaining figure who could translate a noisy backlash into serious power. If Rick Perry loses, the Tea Party will have missed the opportunity of a lifetime.

That is garbage and it is a pro-Perry puff piece that YOU posted because YOU agreed with its message.

Get it yet? Of course you do.

73 posted on 10/09/2011 9:28:01 PM PDT by South40 (Reject the pro-ILLEGAL candidate. Vote conservative -- vote for Herman Cain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom
Ron Paul invented the tea party.

...and Santa Claus invented Christmas.

74 posted on 10/09/2011 9:29:11 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DRey
In a nutshell: if Romney wins, Tea Party goals are toast.

That's only true if Republicans who win Congressional seats are moderates and RINOS. I don't see that happening in all places. Even though the Tea Party hasn't had any large scale gatherings, there are still Tea Partiers working at state levels for candidates who meet their smaller government, less spending criteria.

75 posted on 10/09/2011 9:30:24 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DRey

Good Lord. That’s almost as bad as Helen Thomas. :)

I don’t miss Molly in the leasst.


76 posted on 10/09/2011 9:30:47 PM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: DRey

The TEA Party better not be “over”. I just gave them 50 bucks the other day. Still not answering the phone when the GOP calls.


77 posted on 10/09/2011 9:32:57 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("Greed" is wanting everything and demanding that somebody else pay for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adorno
The tea party is dormant and ineffective right now.

How peculiar. Who do you think is casting winning votes for Cain in organized straw votes every week or so? Who do you think is showing up to protest Obama's appearances when he is out selling his BS? What else do you expect people to do right now?

As for the OWSers, I say let them have all the air time they want. The more they show of themselves the less cred they will have. Remember, the far left is a tiny sliver of the electorate, and the media is in the bag for them already anyway. But the mainstream of the country is as always, ceneter-right, and the Tea Party is right there.

78 posted on 10/09/2011 9:35:37 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: South40

So the NYT is doing a Perry puff piece for its liberal readers, huh? A puff piece that reminds them how awful presidents from Texas have been? Good thinkin’ there, South. You are in such denial about these primaries you cannot see straight.


79 posted on 10/09/2011 9:39:11 PM PDT by DRey (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

12/16/2007 - Rand Paul at Faneuil Hall Boston.

Limited Constitutional Government.

Don’t Tread on Me Flags.

Tri Corner Hats.

And it was actually called Tea Party.


80 posted on 10/09/2011 9:40:54 PM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson