Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Avoiding_Sulla
So why did he not salute the TEA party movement in any way given how its sentiments drove that win? He gave not hint of the TEA party in anyway.

Tom has been with the Tea Party movement since it's beginning. He has given many speeches celebrating that spirit, and he has attended quite a few Tea Party events as the only elected official many of those organizers were willing to include. Go back and search for "McClintock" and "tea Party" on Google. It's easy to do, and something you should have done before even bringing up the topic.

53 posted on 10/09/2011 2:30:37 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: ElkGroveDan

I asked why he did not mention the TEA party in this speech. This was a moderately long speech, and there was plenty of opportunity for him to indicate the importance of the independents like myself.

It is not rocket science to know that there is no love lost between the SKUNCs and the TEA party because their aims are different. Boehner hears it and snubs it regularly in between crying jags.

Because Tom must live with the SKUNCs for now, I do understand there might be some heat. That is my concern that there was heat. We need to know and not just suspect. Too much wiggle room. I’m on Tom’s campaign donor list. I’d like to stay there.


55 posted on 10/09/2011 4:10:11 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (How humanitarian are "leaders" who back Malthusian, Utilitarian & Green nutcases?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson