Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi: Wall Street protests are a Main Street reaction to bank bailouts
The Hill ^

Posted on 10/08/2011 9:56:15 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: Sub-Driver

A question for Pelosi voters: are you embarrassed yet?


41 posted on 10/08/2011 10:57:58 AM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Seems like on Main Street in the real world, people are kind of laughing at the Occupants. As in, don’t they have anything better to do than pout and make messes?


42 posted on 10/08/2011 10:58:02 AM PDT by Cloverfarm (This too shall pass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Well, from what I have read the banks have essentially paid back what they got in the bail out.

And whatever else they have received in aid has not come from Obumer or the Congress critters but from the printing presses of the Federal Reserve.

The wonderful “gifts” they have received from Obumer and the Congress critters were wrapped up together and called “Frank-Dodd” and included dozens of new ways to turn the financial services industry into a public utility managed by the Federal government. Call it a gift of maximum unknown expectations filled with every disincentive not to take risks.

So what was it Pelosi was expecting the banks to do once they paid back their “bail out” money - resuscitate the sub-prime mortgage industry, spin the risk out again into derivatives and support Federal money to “affordable housing” organizers like ACORN?

That is the essential complaint of Pelosi and Obumer. “The banks” (not their stock holders, not their depositors) were “bailed out” and now the banks are not contributing to Mr. Obama’s socialized economic agenda, by putting money back into chasing after Marxist social agendas, instead of looking for value on return of capital put to risk.

No, Pelosi and Obumer have made looking ahead for the next few years riskier and far less certain than anyone could have, and after they created that uncertainty “Wall Street” is too blame for their reticence to buy into it.


43 posted on 10/08/2011 11:27:49 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Didn’t this b!tch vote in favor of the bailouts? And now she has the balls to act as though she was not involved in that fiasco, and nobody in the media is calling her out?

What the fugg?!


44 posted on 10/08/2011 11:42:57 AM PDT by Ernie Kaputnik ((It's a mad, mad, mad world.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

She’s still lying about the spitting incident that never happened.


45 posted on 10/08/2011 11:43:03 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

VERY GOOD POINT

Let us turn this around and use the protests to denounce obama and his admin and all the money he took off Wall street especially Goldman, GE etc.


46 posted on 10/08/2011 11:48:16 AM PDT by manc (Beckett08 an anti war ANSWER troll who re-registered.Promoting the protests, not condemning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“I didn’t hear him say anything when the Tea Party was out demonstrating, actually spitting on members of Congress right here in the Capitol,” Pelosi said.

They just keep telling this lie and nobody calls them on it! Incredible!


47 posted on 10/08/2011 11:53:01 AM PDT by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Bailouts which she (and a majority of Democrats in both houses) voted for!

Which she will NEVER EVER mention.

Nor the fact that they keep voting for bailouts to this very day.


48 posted on 10/08/2011 12:10:31 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Organized groups such as the Democrats and unions could be using the fools actually demonstrating as a means of maintaining themselves in power, perhaps even to the point of initiating violence. To put it another way-a coup. We have already had one politician say elections should be cancelled then immediately backtrack and claim she was joking. Was the statement a trial balloon?
49 posted on 10/08/2011 12:36:19 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Pelosi has absolutely convinced her pea brain that the spitting incident occurred, altho there is no evidence on any video from that day & place.

She is as delusional or worse than Barry the Imposter.


50 posted on 10/08/2011 1:00:39 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Question. Did Miss Nancy vote in the House to bail out the banks? Did Miss Nancy vote in favor of the war against Afghanistan and/or Iraq? Did Miss Nancy support the Bush initiatives to resolve financial problems in the past?

Sorry, Miss Nancy, but before you have ANY credibility, you have a few questions to answer.


51 posted on 10/08/2011 4:04:09 PM PDT by Morgan in Denver (Democrats: the law of unintended consequences in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyingEagle

Good memory.


52 posted on 10/08/2011 4:05:44 PM PDT by Morgan in Denver (Democrats: the law of unintended consequences in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

It’s never been about jobs. It is pure politics and getting reelected.


53 posted on 10/08/2011 4:09:26 PM PDT by Morgan in Denver (Democrats: the law of unintended consequences in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xrmusn

You’re right on all statements. Your “goals” represent the praise and the saving grace for the next election.


54 posted on 10/08/2011 4:24:14 PM PDT by Morgan in Denver (Democrats: the law of unintended consequences in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

Of course! It’s the irony that sticks in my craw...

And those ‘rats like Pelosi get re-elected time and again and look where we are today! Grrrr!


55 posted on 10/08/2011 4:55:04 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

This is what we have to deal with today. It sticks in my craw as well, daily.

After 11-06-2012 I believe we will have different issues on our plate.

I hope you also visit the FR Sunday Thread which critiques the various Sunday talk shows.


56 posted on 10/08/2011 5:19:49 PM PDT by Morgan in Denver (Democrats: the law of unintended consequences in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Tell us again, Nancy, how you weren’t in favor of these bailouts.


57 posted on 10/08/2011 8:30:46 PM PDT by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Because it’s a sin against God.


58 posted on 10/08/2011 8:54:44 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Governor Palin: "I'm not for sale.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson