Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ydoucare
For an easier read on this issue, google the Ankeny v. Daniels case. It is from the 2008 election and the court held that Obama was eligible to be on the Indiana presidential ballot.

Well, no, the court found that the governor couldn't be sued for failing to vet presidential candidates. Nothing in that decision held that Obama was eligible for office.

481 posted on 10/17/2011 7:33:56 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

You said: “Nothing in that decision held that Obama was eligible for office. “

Quick, call 911!!! Your pants are on fire!!!


482 posted on 10/17/2011 8:00:15 PM PDT by Squeeky ("Truth is so rare that it is delightful to tell it. " Emily Dickinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies ]

To: edge919; wintertime
It is amusing how you are constantly wrong on this thread. Here is the holding in Ankeny v Daniels:
“Based upon the language of Article 2 Section 1 clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are Natural Born Citizens for Article 2 Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”
There is nothing about vetting of any candidate. You have this terrible habit of just making things about caselaw. You should realize it can be looked up very easily on the internet. For anyone interested in the truth, the citation for Ankeny v Daniels is 916 N.E.2d 678.
491 posted on 10/17/2011 8:39:51 PM PDT by ydoucare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson