[ydoucare]

It is amusing how you are constantly wrong on this thread. Here is the holding in Ankeny v Daniels:
“Based upon the language of Article 2 Section 1 clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are Natural Born Citizens for Article 2 Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”
There is nothing about vetting of any candidate. You have this terrible habit of just making things about caselaw. You should realize it can be looked up very easily on the internet. For anyone interested in the truth, the citation for Ankeny v Daniels is 916 N.E.2d 678.

[edge919]

There is nothing about vetting of any candidate.

Are you blind or just stupid??

In their complaint, the Plaintiffs appear to suggest that the Governor has a duty to determine a person‟s eligibility to become President in issuing the “Certificate of Ascertainment” ...

Initially, we note that the Plaintiffs do not cite to any authority recognizing that the Governor has a duty to determine the eligibility of a party‟s nominee for the presidency.

Thus, we conclude that Plaintiffs‟ argument that the Governor has allowed President Barack Obama and Senator John McCain to be appointed “Elector in Chief” in violation of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2‟s prohibition against sitting Senators being appointed Elector for any State fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.