[bushpilot1]

“SCOTUS said the child was not deported”

Not true. The SCOTUS said no such thing. You are lost in your little spin world. Get back to reality.

[sometime lurker]

Did you bother to follow the link and read? Or are you just claiming something with no real idea of what you are talking about?

[sometime lurker]

From the government's case for denial of appeal

"As Judge Smith’s panel dissent emphasized, R.M.G. herself “was not arrested, detained, held in custody, or deported—she was with her father and with his consent.”

The SCOTUS then denied petition for a writ of certiorari, Jan 10, 2011. She was not deported. She was in custody of her father, and he took her with him. INS defines deportation as

The formal removal of an alien from the United States when the alien has been found removable for violating the immigration laws.

So are you claiming (however much we may wish it so) that the child, born in the US, was in fact an alien? Especially since the court acknowledged the facts in the case that she was a "natural born citizen," and several times referred to her as a citizen?