"As Judge Smith’s panel dissent emphasized, R.M.G. herself “was not arrested, detained, held in custody, or deported—she was with her father and with his consent.”The SCOTUS then denied petition for a writ of certiorari, Jan 10, 2011. She was not deported. She was in custody of her father, and he took her with him. INS defines deportation as
The formal removal of an alien from the United States when the alien has been found removable for violating the immigration laws.So are you claiming (however much we may wish it so) that the child, born in the US, was in fact an alien? Especially since the court acknowledged the facts in the case that she was a "natural born citizen," and several times referred to her as a citizen?
You specifically claimed the SCOTUS said the following:
“SCOTUS said the child was not deported”
Again where did the SCOTUS say the child was not deported.
“From the government’s case for denial of appeal
“As Judge Smith’s panel dissent emphasized, R.M.G. herself “was not arrested, detained, held in custody, or deported—she was with her father and with his consent.”
This is not the SC stating the child was not deported.
Judge Smith is a Justice of the Supreme Court?
The Justice Department is a part of the Supreme Court?
My rooster knows the denial of a writ does not necessarily mean the SC is in agreement with the decision of the lower court.