It is bitter irony that the biggest communists are people who have achieved their power by exploiting capitalism. So then they have inner conflict. No man can serve two masters. Do they want communism, or do they want money?
I think it was Yuri Bezmenov who basically said that the ultimate goal of communism is to achieve limitless power and wealth for the controllers. When communism is actually achieved there are still resources; it’s just that the resources are in the power of a few elite people, and everybody else is basically slave labor to serve the masters.
So if Soros and Goldman have both sold their souls to be among the ruling elite in a communist world government, there is no conflict of interest. Goldman wouldn’t have to care about investors if he truly believed that capitalism would fall and communism instituted - as long as HE was one of those few elites who would then literally own and control the masses (including those who were previously stock-holders).
We’ll see what happens. But it seems to me that most of the big banking and economy people have seen the writing on the wall and aligned themselves with both communism and Islamism. The bailouts went primarily to foreign banks who had contributed to ACORN and the democrat party and who are shariah-compliant. IOW, they have invested in communism and Islamism ahead of the communist-Islamist takeover. And they’ve been rewarded, and continue to be rewarded by the very douches these moronic communists/anarchists think are going to save them from the greedy capitalist machine.