Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MEGoody
are you okay with governmental interference in use of personal property when it comes to a display of graphic sex

You see...now you are confusing those two issues.

The use of private property for graphic displays of sexual activity is something that is normally licensed by local governments and doing it so that it is on a front lawn for public view would be considered a violation of local law.

If I placed a lawn mower and mannequin as he did, it would not be in violation of any law....so anyone who is offended can pucker up and kiss my arse.

The answer to your question, as stated is..yes. Since it comes down to a violation of local law. Don't like the law? Get it changed. Then display all the sex on your lawn you can stand. If anyone is offended at that point, they can pucker up and kiss your arse....if that is how you would be inclined to respond.

If the graphic display of sexual acts displayed on my front lawn is not a violation of local law or ordinance then the gubmint can feel free to leave me alone.

80 posted on 10/04/2011 1:13:33 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Deploy. Dominate. Disappear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Bloody Sam Roberts
The use of private property for graphic displays of sexual activity is something that is normally licensed by local governments and doing it so that it is on a front lawn for public view would be considered a violation of local law.

Should it be? And if so, shouldn't displays depicting blood and gore also be "licensed"? If not, why not?

91 posted on 10/05/2011 11:25:23 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson