The use of private property for graphic displays of sexual activity is something that is normally licensed by local governments and doing it so that it is on a front lawn for public view would be considered a violation of local law.
Should it be? And if so, shouldn't displays depicting blood and gore also be "licensed"? If not, why not?
91 posted on 10/05/2011 11:25:23 AM PDT by MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)