I think that that statement is highly disputable. I don't remember it that way.
======================================
Herman Cain in 2011
======================================
Herman Cain in 2008
======================================
So given that the choices for Cain in 2008 were Romney, McCain, Huckabee, and Paul, who would you have preferred Cain to have endorsed, and why?
This ought to be good.
The part of that statement that I disagreed with was the “most of FR supported Romney because was better than McCain.” I just included the complete sentence for clarity. I don’t believe that Romney ever had much support on FR.
Duplication over and over does not a case make. Try some new URLs, you might get better traction that way....