Posted on 10/03/2011 9:46:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
As the exodus of taxpayers from the Empire State1 continued during the past decade, which other states gained the most at New York’s expense? And how were migration patterns affected by changing economic conditions?
This paper, second in a series on New York population trends, uses the latest available Internal Revenue Service (IRS) data to answer those questions. Our key findings include the following:
Taxpayer Migration
The IRS records the movement of taxpayers and their dependents, based on year-to-year changes in the addresses shown on individual tax returns. While this excludes persons who don’t file tax returns in the year before or after they move, it measures about 90 percent of migration counted by the U.S. Census.2
As shown in Table 1, nearly 1.2 million taxpayers and their dependents moved from New York to other states between 2000 and 2009. Florida was the most common destination, followed by New Jersey, Pennsylvania and North Carolina, in that order. However, as the economy slowed in the second half of the decade, so did migration.
The drop in net moves from New York to Florida was especially large. In 2005, with migration at its peak, the IRS data indicated New York lost nearly four residents to Florida for every Floridian who moved in the reverse direction. Four years later, in the depths of a recession that was especially severe in the Sunshine State, the number of New Yorkers moving to Florida had dropped by more than half (from 85,619 to 41,371). Meanwhile, the number of Floridians moving to New York increased by 45 percent (from 23,019 to 33,345), reducing the outmigration ratio to 1.24 out-migrants for every in-migrant. By 2009, New York’s net migration loss to North Carolina was larger than its loss to Florida for the first time on record.
As shown in Table 2, the migration pattern to other states was not uniform among different New York regions. While just over half the net migration flow from the New York City metropolitan region was headed South, nearly 40 percent of the taxpayers lost by that region moved to other states in the northeast, mainly neighboring New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Connecticut. The net migration flow from upstate regions overwhelmingly favored the South and West, with fewer headed to New York’s neighbors. This tendency was most pronounced in the Albany region, which lost taxpayers almost entirely to the South and West.
Taxpayer moves within New York
As detailed in Table 3, the migration of taxpayers and their dependents within New York City reflects long-standing population flows from Manhattan to outer boroughs, from Brooklyn to Staten Island, and from all five boroughs—especially Queens—to suburban counties. Roughly 94 percent of the intrastate New York taxpayer-migrants from New York City stayed within the region, moving to either Long Island or the lower Hudson Valley.
New York City also lost a net 16,182 taxpayer-migrants to upstate New York regions, and 566,037 taxpayer-migrants to other states. The New York City region as a whole, including the suburban counties, lost 92,630 taxpayers and their dependents to upstate New York, which in turn lost 491,890 taxpayer-migrants to the rest of the country. The region-by-region breakdown is shown in Table 3a.
Moving Money
The IRS data also provide adjusted gross incomes for migrating individuals and households in the year they move. Measured on this basis, migrants from New York had incomes about $3.3 billion higher than migrants to New York in 2009, down from a peak of $5.3 billion for migrants in 2005.
As shown in Table 4, below, New York’s annual net income losses from 2000 through 2009 totaled nearly $37 billion. Incomes change over time, so this does not necessarily mean New York was $37 billion worse off at the end of the period than it would have been if no moves had occurred during this period. At the very least, however, the average incomes of migrating taxpayers reflect New York’s ongoing loss of earning power – and, in many cases, job skills -- to other states.
From 2001 to 2009, New York State’s greatest annual net income losses, like its greatest population losses, were to Florida and New Jersey, in that order. But Connecticut, the sixth most popular destination state for net migration of individual New Yorkers, ranked third in its net income gain from New York. Conversely, Pennsylvania ranks third in the number of people gained at New York’s expense, but fifth in its net income gain from migrating New Yorkers.
Incomes In, Incomes Out
The average adjusted gross income of taxpaying households leaving New York between 2008 and 2009 was $58,899, while the average income of households moving into New York was $48,432—a difference of 22 percent. Non-migrating New York households as of 2009 had an average income of $63,630.
A county-by-county breakdown of average incomes for interstate migrants to and from New York is presented in Table 5 on page 7. As shown, in 16 of New York’s 62 counties, the average income differential was the reverse of the statewide average; i.e., in these counties, the average incomes of in-migrants from other states were roughly equivalent to or exceeded the average incomes of out-migrants to other states. Higher or roughly equivalent in-migrant incomes were concentrated in less populous, rural upstate counties.
The average income differentials for out-migrants matched or exceeded the statewide average in New York City, Long Island and the lower Hudson Valley suburbs, as well as in all of the most urbanized and populous upstate counties (except for Onondaga County, which includes Syracuse). The largest differential in absolute terms was in New York County (the borough of Manhattan), where the average out-migrant income of $98,637 was 36 percent higher than the in-migrant average of $72,293. The percentage differentials between out-migrants and in-migrants were even higher in the rest of the city.
Turning to a state-level comparison, as detailed in Table 6 on page 8, migrants from New York had higher average incomes than migrants to New York in 42 out of 50 states between 2008 and 2009. New Yorkers migrating to New Jersey, the most common destination state, had incomes $10,579 higher than the smaller number making the reverse move. The differential was $23,751 among New York migrants to and from Connecticut, which also attracted the most affluent New Yorkers, on average.
The average income data for migrants to and from New York reflect the same pattern as the aggregate income and population data: southeastern states, and neighboring Connecticut and New Jersey, have been the biggest net beneficiaries of the Empire State’s losses—which can be traced largely to the New York City metropolitan region.
As detailed in Table 6 on page 8, the IRS data show that 177,505 federal tax returns were filed by former New Yorkers who had moved to other states in 2009, and 148,733 returns were filed by households that moved into New York from other states that year.
Endnotes:
1E.J. McMahon and Robert Scardamalia, “Empire State’s Half-Century Exodus: A Population Migration Overview,” Empire Center Research Bulletin, No. 6.1, August 2011.
2For further background on how the Census Bureau computes migration for its American Community Survey, see Thibaudeau, Yves (2001), “Can We Ignore the Migration of Income Tax Non-Filers When Benchmarking the American Community Survey’s County Estimates?” U.S. Census Bureau, at www.fcsm.gov/01papers/Thibaudeau.pdf
|
Unfortunate, you have seen people treated poorly. I have never seen anyone, where I live, be treated poorly from not being from NY. There is no debate from me about how liberal NY state is. I think that is why most leave. It does get frustrating always seeing NY painted in such broad strokes.
There are many things I miss about N.Y/Long Island. I miss being 10 minutes from the beach. I miss good Pizza. You can’t find a good Pizza down here to save your life. I miss the N.Y. Mets. However, the positives of living in Texas greatly outweigh the few negatives.
N.Y. has changed into an unrecognizable place from the days of my childhood. When I was a kid, the local high school in N.Y had a rifle team which actually allowed kids to carry their .22 rifles to and from school — that blows many people’s minds when you tell them that today. People back then may have been Democrats, but they were hard-working, blue collar, patriotic Americans — not the sissy-boy, brain-washed Marxists who predominate in N.Y. politics today.
I was a young campaign worker for Ronald Reagan in 1984. Reagan actually won N.Y handily that year. My how things have changed for the worse.
Anyhow, get out of N.Y. while you can. America still exists out here in “fly-over” country. Perhaps, one day N.Y. can be “liberated” from enemy occupation, but I would not count on that happening any day soon. LOL.
LOL!!
Remember the signs?
Get Out Of New York While You Still Can
............Save The OBI...............
};^)
Move to Brownsville.
Never been to Brownsville. I do like Port Aransas though.
No, relocation to the coast is not gonna happen for job and other considerations.
I would like to permanently move to the hill country, but the commute to work would be prohibitive. Perhaps, when I retire.
I spent a weekend in July there once. Hottest place I think I've ever been, but it is in Texas and it is on the coast.
Bringing their money wouldn’t be so much of a problem but, unfortunately, they brought their opinions as well. Somehow, the money just isn’t worth it.
Yes! LOL, The OBI.
New Yorkers move to Florida and make both states more democrat.
The heat is one of the few negatives to living in Texas.
Normally, three months out of the year, the heat causes you to hide inside with the AC or to sit in a pool all the time. This year it was even worse. However, the rest of the year, the weather is fantastic.
So, I will put up with the periodic heat from Hades, to be free and happy.
In North Caroline, McLame lost by 14,177 votes, by 2008 98,000 New Yorkers had occupied North Carolina turning it into a liberal win for 0.
Anyone who thinks that the influx of liberals from the northeast isn't a problem or something that we local yokels in fly over country are exaggerating should keep these numbers in mind.
If you love NY, STAY THERE!
You should go and post this on Huffington Post or DU for the desired effect. Anybody reading this forum from Yankee land, is likely to be as conservative, if not more conservative than you. I know. I spent many years “behind enemy lines” debating rabid liberals in the North East. So, you are right in general terms. A large influx of yankees into a state tends to push state politics left-wards. But, you are wrong in sending that message to North-East stranded Freepers, because it does not apply to them. If anything, we must use this forum as a “Radio-Free America” to provide moral and ideological support to our fellow patriots stuck behind “enemy lines”. I don’t think it’s wise to write off large blocks of people just because of where they live. Anyhow, there’s quite a few southerners who would fit better up north and the reverse is definitely true.
Me too! Happy Birthday--I just celebrated my 49th yesterday. :) I'm so glad I was able to cast a ballot for Ronald Reagan.
Now you're showing your yankee colors. There are very few posters on this forum that fit that category. Some believe in "reasonable" restrictions on firearms. Some think a national sales tax added to our income tax (al la Cain) is a good idea. Some are all for cutting government spending EXCEPT, NASA, police, etc. So it isn't copyright post it yourself in those aforementioned cesspools.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.