Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

As a summer employee of Kodak during my college years, I can attest to the mismanagement I saw. Kodak had a military type organizational structure with layer upon layer of useless management. They were not prepared for changes in technology and competition. Fuji scared the daylights out of them and they went downhill from there. They didn't have a clue about how to right the ship. RIP Kodak.
1 posted on 10/03/2011 9:26:15 AM PDT by shortstop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: shortstop; Daffynition
Good riddance!

Kodak is one of the worst companies for enforced political correctness in the whole United States. I've been boycotting them for years. It serves them right that in concentrating on political correctness, they've lost the competitive edge to allow them to develop industry leading digital imaging products to replace their silver halide technologies. They've been living off their old reputation and goodwill for too long.

Here's a link to a related thread.

Kodak shares plunge as bankruptcy fears escalate
YahooFinance ^ | Sep 30, 2011 | MICHAEL LIEDTK
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2787139/posts
Posted on 10/3/2011 10:48:51 AM by Daffynition

2 posted on 10/03/2011 9:40:08 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

That actually made me tear up a bit.


3 posted on 10/03/2011 9:41:11 AM PDT by BigCinBigD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop
damn shame... RIP
4 posted on 10/03/2011 9:45:01 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

The company either did not see or ignored the threat of the disruptive technology that was digital photography. Polaroid made the same mistake.


5 posted on 10/03/2011 9:45:08 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop
I had a prof in B school that related his tale of doing some consulting work at Kodak. Raised his hand one day in an internal mtg and asked how they planned to approach the then-coming digital picture and print-at-home wave.

He said they looked at him like he was crazy and ignored him from there.

6 posted on 10/03/2011 9:46:48 AM PDT by Sam's Army
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

I agree. I have done business with them for years. Never in my career have a seen a more broken corporate culture. Every meeting has a “Cast of Thousands” where no one wants to make a decision. People change positions like Musical Chairs, and there is no accountability along the way. Once Rochester’s great employer, now a mere remnant of the past.........


7 posted on 10/03/2011 9:46:57 AM PDT by SixIron (Golf and liberal thinking- life's great frustrations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

In the mid-80s my group was working with Kodak on a new product line. We were going to purchase the product. One day a hatchet man showed up with the Kodak development team. The message was “you fund our remaining development and purchase the product at an inflated price and these people won’t get laid off.” We didn’t bite.


9 posted on 10/03/2011 9:50:22 AM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

I used Kodak slide film for years until I finally had to go with Fuji. Boy was Kodachrome a great product. I have color slides my Grandparents took from the mid 40’s that are so vibrant in color, you would have thought they were shot yesterday.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZpaNJqF4po


10 posted on 10/03/2011 9:50:50 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

I thought they had died a long time ago. I have not seen a roll of Verichrome Pan 127 roll film on the shelf in many years.


11 posted on 10/03/2011 9:51:52 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

Hasselblad went to the moon.


13 posted on 10/03/2011 9:53:37 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

Kodak copiers were a silly misadventure.


15 posted on 10/03/2011 9:55:29 AM PDT by listenhillary (Look your representatives in the eye and ask if they intend to pay off the debt. They will look away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

Google search for Kodak Political Correctness

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=bvie&cp=18&gs_id=2j&xhr=t&q=kodak+political+correctness&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&source=hp&pbx=1&oq=kodak+political+co&aq=0v&aqi=g-v1&aql=f&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=f898fa5c2f00d7d8&biw=1886&bih=1078


18 posted on 10/03/2011 9:58:43 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

I agree about the layers of useless management. I worked at a subsidiary called ATEX all through the 1980’s. Same mentality there until almost 1990. Absolutely clueless. An article about a 10% RIF appeared in the Boston Globe the morning before it happened. Upper management dismissed the report. Because, as they said, “it was only a 9% RIF”.


19 posted on 10/03/2011 10:04:10 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

One can look at a company as a “scale model” of a company. It may start out on a very good tact, with good economic policy and thinking. It may even prosper for awhile on past glory. But, eventually, with enough of the wrong people in the wrong places at the wrong time, it can begin to collapse, and when it reaches a sort of critical mass of mismanagement, nothing can stop it from winking out of existence.


21 posted on 10/03/2011 10:07:33 AM PDT by 6SJ7 (If found, please turn me in to AttackWatch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop
Another great American company driven into the ground by Morons with MBAs™.
22 posted on 10/03/2011 10:10:26 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop; Daffynition; Elsie

Modern Art Photography

If we consider the history of creating imagery from primitive to the modern there must be certain timelines that account for how things happened. The ancients in the region recorded their thoughts, left messages and depicted their lives on the canyon walls, in their caves and on any media they found useful. Certainly all cultures found their own way to communicate; the talented few always came forward as their recorders of history. Were these talented few born with the creativity? Or did they develop this talent through intensive training in the technical process?

If we spring forward a thousand years we have the benefit of watching the evolution of the form. Although photography dates back to Leonardo da Vinci's inventions during the Renaissance, the modern camera was invented in the 1830s with daguerreotypes. The first cameras were large and bulky, so people came to the photographer's studio to have their pictures taken. This meant that the main purpose was to record what people looked like, which could be done more quickly and inexpensively than ever before. This has had a profound impact on art, and has prompted many artists to explore new styles. And so, modernism was born.

In painting and printmaking the form evolved into what was called “the new art,” beginning with the impressionists in about 1870. Photography continued recording the accuracy of what people looked like or to record history as evidenced during the Civil War with Mathew Brady. Here in Utah C.R. Savage was one of the first to record the important history. In southern Utah Jack Hillers accompanied John Wesley Powell in 1872 in the explorations of the Grand Canyon.

The science of the form drove their technique. But was it art? Most imagery was posed and not impromptu as evidenced by E.S Curtis and his circle. Images looked stilted and did not leave much to the imagination. But suddenly we spring forward to the turn of the twentieth century and the group formed in New York by Alfred Stieglitz.

Stieglitz was originally a leading figure in the promotion of the idea that photography harbored the same aesthetic potential as painting. He fostered the progress of artistic photography in this direction by showcasing the work of young photographers who challenged the dominant conception of the medium. Instead of showcasing the use of photography as a tool for documenting or depicting the details of nature, these young photographers attempted to show, primarily through imitation of painterly styles, that photography could attain status as an art form.

This new approach to art photography was inspirational for all that followed the form. They strive to do more than record the images of nature, rather they make a serious effort in creating art; art that is beyond simple imagery. This approach to modernism was introduced to the painter Maynard Dixon in 1920 when he met the young New York photographer Dorothea Lange. Dixon began distilling and simplifying his approach.

This period, 1920-1960, brought Dorothea Lange, Edward Weston, Ansel Adams and several other modernists to these regions for the purpose of making fine art photography. These were the purists with serious bias about their art form in black and white. Much of the art occurred in the darkroom. And then there was the life of photographic paper. The argument was that color would not hold. As color was introduced in the late thirties the art photographers held steady with their beliefs about the power of black and white. Several pioneers broke away from the old beliefs as papers improved with newer coatings and a better lifespan. Eliot Porter and David Muench in particular continued with the science of color as an art form.

And then digital happened. All of the old ideas about the art form changed.

After thirty years of work in all the above, Modern Art Photography was born. Suddenly new converts having found their own voices in this new digital world. The technical side of the problem is conquered with powerful technology from Canon and Nikon. The science is now taken care of and it is only left up to the artist to find his own voice in this brave new world.

ub, Copyright 2009

Jack Hillers Show Opens in two weeks.

23 posted on 10/03/2011 10:17:24 AM PDT by Utah Binger (Southern Utah where INVITED Freepers will meet again next summer. Jim Robinson Too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

It used to be if you got a job at Kodak you were set for life. Sad to see it’s a dinosaur now.


24 posted on 10/03/2011 10:18:00 AM PDT by McGruff (Vetting - The process of examination and evaluation of a candidate's record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

Companies come, companies go...adapt or die.


25 posted on 10/03/2011 10:20:19 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

I worked there as a software engineer

The woman in charge was an idiot so I told them I was leaving and gave two weeks notice

The idiot woman told me I couldn’t leave. I insisted for the two weeks that I was going. She honestly thought as the boss she could ORDER me to stay. She came from a government agency (20 and out!)

When I didnt show up the next Monday after my two weeks notice I got about 20 phone calls asking where I was, including several telling me I had to come to a meeting they would organize to explain myself.

I told them I didnt work there any more and I was not planning on coming to their meeting. They CALLED me from the meeting...

Then when they found out this idiot woman didnt know anything about writing software and needed to call me back to finish it about a years later, I found out I was on their ‘black list’ because I left and they could not hire me back. (Remember- THEY called ME to come back, because I was the only one who was able to make it work)

Libtards, all of them


26 posted on 10/03/2011 10:22:49 AM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Bachman 2012- unbeatable ticket~!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shortstop

Those who still have grandad’s stock certificates for E.H.& T Anthony are laughing in their hats.


28 posted on 10/03/2011 10:24:12 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson