Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KODAK IS DEAD
boblonsberry.com ^ | 10/03/11 | Bob Lonsberry

Posted on 10/03/2011 9:26:07 AM PDT by shortstop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: Hatteras

Every once in a while I see devices that transfers slides to your computer in catalogs like Sharper Image. As far as I know, they are full size when they are transferred. I know our local camera shop gets an arm and a leg to do it so I just break out the old Kodak carousel and screen.


41 posted on 10/03/2011 10:47:38 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

I used to work in the industry. I mixed chemistry and monitored the Kodachrome and print processors.

I remember the days when we were having trouble keeping the Kodak high speed printers in balance. The kodak rep. said we had to use Kodak paper. The plant manager got him to show up anyway, but parked 3 skids of Fuji paper outside the printer room doors so the rep. had to walk around them.


42 posted on 10/03/2011 10:48:15 AM PDT by READINABLUESTATE ((Most leftism can be traced to childhood birthday trauma))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

At Raychem (another company that is no more) we called them HMBAs. The management (which included as president a guy whose wife was one of the heirs to the Levi Strauss bucks and who went to Harvard) was enamored with Harvard MBA’s. They were over paid and most of them could not figure out the way to the men’s room. Now Raychem is no more, having been swallowed up by Kosloski and Company (Tyco). The other hallmark of Raychem was the management always having their self-interest above that of the company.


43 posted on 10/03/2011 10:49:35 AM PDT by vette6387 (Enough Already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

Hasselblad camera, Kodak film.


44 posted on 10/03/2011 10:51:18 AM PDT by jnaujok (Charter member of the vast, right-wing conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

All around us
Everywhere we look
Every moment that we live
Can fill a picture book
Light and shadows
Smiles and sentimental tears
They’re a precious treasure
We can cherish through the years
Making memories, making memories
Taking pictures is making memories
Catching little pieces of time
Making them yours, making them mine
Great vacations and celebrations
Can fade away in a year
Cause when we’re making memories
Happy days are always here
Happy days are always here


45 posted on 10/03/2011 10:54:53 AM PDT by Armando Guerra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

My God... small world. I worked there as a software engineer for many years. I probably know who you are referring to. Are her initials NP by any chance? Or possibly AF? They had the worst management of any company, not pnly on Earth, but in the entire galaxy..


46 posted on 10/03/2011 10:56:03 AM PDT by Kratos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

I worked at Kodak for 5 years.

As the digital imaging revolution arrived, Kodak lost sight of their customer. They thought retail stores were the customers, and satisfied their demands ... but the button pushing picture taking public were the real customers, and when (despite plenty of warning) the general public went digital en mass, film providers were far behind the curve.

Kodak had great technology, but chose to outsource digital products instead of make the massive painful transition to leverage that technology for a changing market. Being a photographic chemical company, they had the choice of sticking to photographic or chemical but not both. They chose wrong.

This a company which, AFAIK into the ‘90s, had an indoor rifle range.


47 posted on 10/03/2011 11:00:25 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Let’s not forget the indoor pool they built on the 6th floor at Kodak Park. The never filled the pool because nobody did the math until after it was built, somebody ran the numbers and reported that the building would collapse if they filled it with water. They used it for years as a developing tank for large prints. I kid you not.. this actually happened.


48 posted on 10/03/2011 11:08:36 AM PDT by Kratos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
Interesting bit of trivia: George Eastman didn't even invent the roll film which launched Kodak as a company. He bought the patent from a Scottish immigrant gentleman farmed named David Henderson Houston.

Houston farmed in Dakota Territory and the name Kodak came from Dakota. Of course, once the invention became famous and Eastman became involved in lawsuit infringement patents as to just which patent rights he had purchased, he tried to claim the name of his now famous company was inspired by the sound of a camera clicking.

49 posted on 10/03/2011 11:14:51 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

I used to do field service for a formerly great instrument and computer company at all the EK facilities in the Rochester area. I was at one of the guarded entrances to the park when Ronald Reagan visited. He stood with the guards for photos. A week later when I returned one of the guards showed me the photo. It was printed on Fuji paper. We both had a good laugh over that one.


50 posted on 10/03/2011 11:15:47 AM PDT by printhead (Standard & Poor - Poor is the new standard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

gentleman farmed farmer named David Henderson Houston
51 posted on 10/03/2011 11:16:24 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

Kodak should just be thankful that they didn’t reach their zenith during the Obama/democrat occupation of our government - they’d have been taken over by the government “for the common good”, no doubt...


52 posted on 10/03/2011 11:20:31 AM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug

” I have not seen a roll of Verichrome Pan 127 roll film on the shelf in many years.”

Ha! Nobody has. I still have an old 127 box camera. I used my share of Verichrome Pan 120, though. It made a great b&w proofing film for Ektacolor. I’ll miss Kodak. My whole Vietnam tour was recorded with many rolls Tri-X and a Voightlander Vito.


Another bone-headed idea from Kodak - they created their own film sizes. I have several old medium format cameras that take 120 size film that I can still use. (The rest of the World created cameras for this film) I also have several old Kodak bellows and box cameras that look really cool and probably would still work if film was available.

I also had a Kodak Instamatic as a kid. Worst quality pictures ever. That camera made me and probably a whole generation move to 35MM (another non-Kodak size film) using Japanese and German cameras.

BTW, I also have a Voightlander Vitessa which I have actually used. Good lens, takes very good pictures. Unfortunately, have now gone completely over to the Dark Side (digital). Film was fun.


53 posted on 10/03/2011 11:22:51 AM PDT by A. Patriot (Have we lost our Republic? Do the majority of Americans care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
fall to the dust heap of history

My dad is fond of saying that all of the places he consulted for are gone now, either bankrupt, or sold and broken up. The list included (what was) the largest Textile manufacturer in the world, (what was) the largest insurer in the world, and (what was) the largest trucking company in the world.

His attitude? You should work to live, not the other way 'round. Work is a means to an end, that's all, and is rarely a permanent fixture.

IMHO, he's right. IF I dedicated myself to my work, sacrificing my family and everything that's *really* important.... And IF that dedication allows me to rise to the top of the heap in my organization.... And IF my company is still around 50 years from now....

...I might have a conference room named after me at the company's HQ. And, if I was lucky, someone might read my name off a dusty plaque and say "Hmmmmph. Wonder who this "WBill" person was?". But only if they were killing time in between meetings.

Business is transient, by definition. Faith, Family, Community... IMHO, these are the things that are really important.

/rant off. Stepping down from my soapbox.

54 posted on 10/03/2011 11:27:31 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA; Hatteras
Every once in a while I see devices that transfers slides to your computer in catalogs like Sharper Image. As far as I know, they are full size when they are transferred. I know our local camera shop gets an arm and a leg to do it so I just break out the old Kodak carousel and screen.

My sister bought one of those "Sharper Image" scanners - totally frustrating to use. Painfully slow, too.

If you have a lot of slides to scan, one of the flatbed scanners with slide insert/holder is what you need. The HP models generally come with pretty good software for resizing the images and doing color touch-up work (though Kodachrome rarely needs much help in that regard).

55 posted on 10/03/2011 11:30:50 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD

That actually made me tear up a bit.

Yep, me too.
I remember as a child (I’m dating myself here)my parents would say to each other - Did you bring the Kodak? Don’t forget the Kodak. It was never the camera - we only knew Kodak.


56 posted on 10/03/2011 11:38:31 AM PDT by Bitsy (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

I watched MBA’s destroy Hughes Aircraft Company.


57 posted on 10/03/2011 11:38:40 AM PDT by saminfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: A. Patriot

“...Voightlander Vitessa...Good lens, takes very good pictures.”

Carl Zeiss lenses. Great quality.


58 posted on 10/03/2011 11:38:44 AM PDT by beelzepug ("Blind obedience to arbitrary rules is a sign of mental illness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

They make FILM?


59 posted on 10/03/2011 11:39:14 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
Morons with MBAs™

Amen brother!

60 posted on 10/03/2011 11:40:27 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson