Doesn’t truly affect the big picture. Bacterial DNA undergoes one of the fastest known re-production cycles, yet even during high stress it only produces more of it’s own kind ~ more bacteria.
How come the rare Japanese plant, Paris Japonica, has a gene expression 15% larger than the marbled lungfish, and both have a gene expression over 100 times larger than human DNA yet neither shows any superiority to mankind?
How come monkeys, are closest living relative, show no signs of higher intelligence than most any other wild animal yet many in the wild kingdom show intelligence skills in sonar or navigation far surpassing man?
Please don’t think I expect an answer. This is just an example of the circular ‘logic’ employed in old age geologic dating methods.
Did you see my post of Dr John Morris’ “Parable of a Potato Peeler” that demonstrates the assumptions inherent in the “gold standard” of old earth belief, radiometric dating?
It was in the first 100 comments on this article. I’ll try to find it. Didn’t get any comments on it, surprisingly.
You propose that mutations are not desirable and that they cannot lead to positive outcomes.
Yet you cannot explain why bacteria have an error prone DNA polymerase that is expressed during stress.
Science has an answer.
Creationism, as is usual, has nothing of any value.
Your inability to reconcile reality with your Creationist view of the world should cause you to question your assumptions.
It should really trouble you.
The fact that you are content to go on in ignorance troubles me.
Why the inability to answer a simple question about mutation if you are so sure it is some sort of ‘mathematical law’ that mutations cannot lead to beneficial outcomes?