Posted on 10/03/2011 3:19:27 AM PDT by AdmSmith
The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet has today decided that
The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2011
shall be divided, with one half jointly to
Bruce A. Beutler and Jules A. Hoffmann
for their discoveries concerning the activation of innate immunity
and the other half to
Ralph M. Steinman
for his discovery of the dendritic cell and its role in adaptive immunity
This year's Nobel Laureates have revolutionized our understanding of the immune system by discovering key principles for its activation.
Scientists have long been searching for the gatekeepers of the immune response by which man and other animals defend themselves against attack by bacteria and other microorganisms. Bruce Beutler and Jules Hoffmann discovered receptor proteins that can recognize such microorganisms and activate innate immunity, the first step in the body's immune response. Ralph Steinman discovered the dendritic cells of the immune system and their unique capacity to activate and regulate adaptive immunity, the later stage of the immune response during which microorganisms are cleared from the body.
The discoveries of the three Nobel Laureates have revealed how the innate and adaptive phases of the immune response are activated and thereby provided novel insights into disease mechanisms. Their work has opened up new avenues for the development of prevention and therapy against infections, cancer, and inflammatory diseases.
(Excerpt) Read more at nobelprize.org ...
This research is important for developing new vaccines and treatment for autoimmune diseases.
Did they all reach a consensus though? That is an important thing in science, right?
The innate immunology is the first line of defense and is non-specific, fast and has no memory of earlier infections.
Steinman discovered, 25 years earlier, in 1973, the dendritic cell, a cell that controls adaptive immunity that is the second line of defense. It is slow and has memory, and is the cell type that is active when we get vaccines.
Consensus is related to the interpretation of the experiments and is not as important as being able to repeat the experiments. If a discovery is done that can be repeated, it might be the case that it is in conflict with the general consensus about what is happening. Then someone has to think and that is normally done by only on person and if he or she figures out an explanation it might later be part of the “consensus”.
According to the regulations you can not get the prize if you are dead. My guess is that it will be issued to him anyhow.
Ping
Thanks, AdmSmith.
BTTT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.