Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ari-freedom
The "pandering" part is where he essentially apologizes for NOT speaking up to defend the gay soldier. Which suggests that, looking BACK, he has now decided the gay soldier was being attacked, and should be defended.

At the debate, a gay soldier called up, identified himself as a gay soldier, and asked if the candidates would re-institute DADT. That is when some in the audience booed.

They booed him for asking a question suggesting the GOP should support DADT. There was no reason for ANY of the candidates to "defend the soldier".

Of course, this is only happening to Cain because he is now the front-runner. We saw what they did to Perry, who had been extensively vetted in multiple governor campaigns. Just imagine how they can tear down a guy who has never been through a campaign before.

Unless you are a democrat, I think it's hard make a presidential run if you haven't been through a few gruelling election cycles.

32 posted on 10/02/2011 3:19:21 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

mark


72 posted on 10/02/2011 3:47:40 PM PDT by loboinok (Gun control is hitting what you aim at!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson