To: Red Steel
Interesting that 99.9% of those who are push for legal “protection” for animals believe in evolution. I thought part of evolutionary theory was what is often termed “survival of the fittest”. If these animals can’t adapt to a changing environment, from an evolutionary perspective, shouldn’t we just be letting them die out?
2 posted on
09/30/2011 12:11:33 PM PDT by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: MEGoody
Interesting that 99.9% of those who are push for legal protection for animals believe in evolution. I thought part of evolutionary theory was what is often termed survival of the fittest. If these animals cant adapt to a changing environment, from an evolutionary perspective, shouldnt we just be letting them die out? I have long believed that the Endangered Species Act should be repealed. If a species is too stupid to adapt to changing conditions, then so be it.
To: MEGoody
Interesting that 99.9% of those who are push for legal protection for animals believe in evolution. I thought part of evolutionary theory was what is often termed survival of the fittest. If these animals cant adapt to a changing environment, from an evolutionary perspective, shouldnt we just be letting them die out? I have long believed that the Endangered Species Act should be repealed. If a species is too stupid to adapt to changing conditions, then so be it.
To: MEGoody
Extinction is a way of life on earth. Why fight it?
26 posted on
09/30/2011 6:49:33 PM PDT by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson