This was the WORTHLESS BASTARD the started this “sexual Revolution”: http://www.amazon.com/Kinsey-Crimes-Consequences-Queen-Scheme/dp/0966662415/ref=wl_it_dp_o_npd?ie=UTF8&coliid=IWG4U97UUUC1D&colid=3QEHOQMYACE8C
Amen I say.
This country badly needs divorce reform so that people cannot commit to serial monogamy as a way of life
One husband to one wife needs to become the ideal.
The idea that “it’s all good” needs to stop. Drug use/abuse is not good. Smoking cigarettes is not good. Alcoholism is not good. Sex outside of marriage is not good. Friends with benefits is not good.
I agree with most of the article. This part is just nonsense.
Europe at least considers us old fogies and puritans when it comes to sex. They're farther down the Sexual Revolution road than we are.
The only part of the world that really despises us for this, AFAIK, is the Muslim world, with most of the Muslim men anxious to participate personally but concerned their women might join in.
I think we SHOULD be despised by the world for this, but I don't believe we are.
Crime hasn't increased. Nor has disease overall.
And does anyone reading this thread even know anyone with Syphillis? Back in the "Good ol' Days" before the sexual revolution all sorts of famous people had Syphillis.
This may interest you.
fdr on steroids.
ping
It’s not a revolution, it’s a marketing strategy.
This was not the only ‘sexual revolution’ in human history, and therefore we can study the previous outcomes and forecast the likely oucome of this one. At the core of any sexual revolution is the radical separation of sex from any procreative purpose and from the stable context of marriage.
We have seen this before in the Gonostic sects of ancient and Medieval times, in the Adamites of 14th Century Bohemia and the Libertine and Mattchinne movements in 18th Century France and in the Bolsevik Revolution in Ruussia.
However the first thing that happens to any group or culture that succumbs is a drastic decline in the birth rate. Sexual revolutions are thus intrinsically self-defeating and rapidly fade after about a generation, or are forceably reversed, as in the case of the Soviet Union.
In the early days of that Bolshevik regime, sex was ‘liberated’, divorce by demand, contraception and abortion on demand, homosexuality deciminalized. By 1929 the Soviet Union became the hardest place in the world to get a divorce. In 1932, homosexuality was recriminalized as ‘social menace’. In 1936, abortion was outlawed and access to contraception became more restricted. Why did the Soviet regime do this? Was it because their leaders had starting reading the Bible, or reading Papal Encyclical letters? No, they simply realized that (apart from the ravages of Marxist ‘economics’) Russian society faced total demographic collapse.
Just as obscure theses are now written about the Mattachine movement in France in the 18th Century, so we will see, at the end of the 21st Century books will be wriiten about the rise and fall of the gay movement.
The odd thing is that they don't seem to actually be enjoying it. They are so grim and serious. You have to have sex. And it has to be with a lot of people. And you must do every thing under the sun. I keep on expecting the next piece of advice to be, "lie back and think of England."