Nothing I can cite OTHER THAN MY OWN REPORTING means he has some basis for it based on his own reporting.
I’m not even making a judgment on whether that reporting is any good. I simply don’t care.
I don’t care if she slept with the guy. You people clearly do. But chances are, she did. The facts all match up. It’s okay. Even Saint Sarah can have sex out of wedlock. Even with a black guy.
I always wondered how the Weekly World News stays in business. After reading "GatorGirl" and "Jonty30" I now know why and understand much more about their apparent customer base.
Um, that means he has no proof. Read it again. He only has HIS OWN REPORTING. Did you even bother to read his email or are you just having fun playing the smear game?
I dont care if she slept with the guy. You people clearly do.
We care about truth. You do not.
But chances are, she did. The facts all match up.
What facts? There are none. And the author admitted that.
Explosive Email Shows Anti-Palin Author McGinniss, Random House Likely Published Literary Hoax
Thusas Random House lawyers are already pointing out to menothing I can cite other than my own reporting rises above the level of tawdry gossip. The proof is always just around the corner, but thats a corner nobody has been able to turn.