Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: circumbendibus

Justices aren’t back from vacation until first part of October. Why would they agree on this one after turning down all the others?


14 posted on 09/26/2011 8:15:35 PM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: shield

The issue has now “ripened” or “seasoned” (whatever the legal jargon is) that it is now ready to be heard.

Why did the 9th circuit out of the blue grant an appeal to Taitz and Kreep? Dunno.

My guess is Hillary through Bill have the judges poised to act when the time is right. That’s only a guess. If she brings him down this way, she might feel she would not be tarnished and grab the Dem 2012 nomination.


22 posted on 09/26/2011 8:23:22 PM PDT by circumbendibus (Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: shield

They didn’t agree on this one. All they did was put it on a list to be discussed and voted upon in conference. It’s not unusual.

They already had a conference scheduled today to review many cases. They’ll deny most without comment, but some they’ll grant. October is when they’ll begin hearing oral arguments.


29 posted on 09/26/2011 8:43:38 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson