Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunken treasure awarded to Spain
Legal News Line ^ | 9-26-11 | Michael P. Tremoglie

Posted on 09/26/2011 12:23:37 PM PDT by Miami Vice

A sunken treasure worth about $500 million was discovered by an American company has been awarded to Spain by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.

The treasure-laden Spanish ship was located off the coast of Gibraltar in 2007. It had been sunk during a naval battle with the British navy in 1804.

Several parties made claim to the treasure. The company that made the recovery, Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc., the governments of Spain and Peru, and 25 individuals who were descendants of the sailors on the ship.

The federal district court, which heard the original case, ruled ...

(Excerpt) Read more at legalnewsline.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: courts; federalcourt; maritime; ruling; spain; treasure
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Miami Vice

Need somebody old enough or sick enough not to care about the consequences: destroy it.


21 posted on 09/26/2011 12:51:20 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miami Vice
Actually the ship was sunk off the southern coast of Portugal.

http://www.napoleon-series.org/military/battles/1804/c_santamaria.html

The action is fictionalized in both the Horatio Hornblower and the Aubrey-Maturin series, with the fictional heroes of each respectively playing a part in the action.

22 posted on 09/26/2011 12:51:37 PM PDT by Cheburashka (If life hands you lemons, government regulations will prevent you from making lemonade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar; SeeSharp

You guys are exactly right. “Treasure Hunters” are going back underground. What they find will go to “treasure friendly” nations and the only way it ever finds its way into the United States is by the black market.

People will still go find this stuff, but the Spanish will never get any of it.

And the claim by descendants of the crew? Give me a break. The crew never had title to it to begin with. Government of Peru? Peru was owned by Spain when the stuff was dug up.

I have just as valid a claim on the gold as some of these people.


23 posted on 09/26/2011 12:52:33 PM PDT by henkster (Socialists and liberals all want jobs; they just don't want to work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Miami Vice
The court also referenced a 2001 signing statement by President Clinton which stated, "(the United States) recognizes that title to a United States or foreign sunken State craft, wherever located, is not extinguished by passage of time, regardless of when such sunken State craft was lost at sea."

So if they stole it from the Mayans (or the Aztecs, or whomever they stole it from), it's theirs forever?

24 posted on 09/26/2011 12:52:34 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

Oh, should never show your stuff.


25 posted on 09/26/2011 12:53:59 PM PDT by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by Perry and his fellow democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Same old same old, white man screws indians.


26 posted on 09/26/2011 12:56:31 PM PDT by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by Perry and his fellow democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Miami Vice
The court also referenced a 2001 signing statement by President Clinton which stated, "(the United States) recognizes that title to a United States or foreign sunken State craft, wherever located, is not extinguished by passage of time, regardless of when such sunken State craft was lost at sea."

Just before Clinton left office? Wonder how much he got paid for this signature?

27 posted on 09/26/2011 1:00:50 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

I don’t think the issue should even be decided based on who originally owned it. The homesteading principle provides for re-homesteading of property that has been abandoned. It should simply be a matter of finders keepers.


28 posted on 09/26/2011 1:02:15 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Miami Vice

Search, Salvage, Shut up.


29 posted on 09/26/2011 1:03:02 PM PDT by Hacklehead (Had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

I’ve read in the past that a warship and its contents, remains the propoerty of whatever country/navy it sailed for, but a merchant vessel is finders keepers.


30 posted on 09/26/2011 1:06:19 PM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

If that’s what it takes for these salvage divers to keep from being robbed blind, then fire up the smelters.


31 posted on 09/26/2011 1:08:22 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

Loose lips
lost a sunk ship.


32 posted on 09/26/2011 1:10:33 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Inter continental railroad—your sly humor deserves recognition!


33 posted on 09/26/2011 1:12:19 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Miami Vice

Dump it back in the ocean; if Spain wants it, f*** ‘em, they can go get it themselves.


34 posted on 09/26/2011 1:12:41 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miele man
If the courts and treaties give title to treasure and “booty” in perpetuity, then why go to the expense of hunting for treasure?

Whatever happened to "finders, keepers"

35 posted on 09/26/2011 1:13:31 PM PDT by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Miami Vice

Since in 1804 Spain was an absolute monarchy, shouldn’t the present King of Spain—not the Spanish government—be the rightful owner, as the lineal heir to the 1804 owner?


36 posted on 09/26/2011 1:16:11 PM PDT by CivilWarguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
So if I find $20,000, I should turn it over to the police??

Never happen. I'll spend $1000 a year for 20 years...all cash deals.

37 posted on 09/26/2011 1:20:46 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Captain Beyond
Well, this ruling has achieved one thing: nobody will openly attempt to salvage any lost wreckage again; it will all be done on the sly.

All such rulings do is make it certain that the next time a salvage is done, the salvage company will make d@mn sure to extract the jewels, then melt down the gold and silver, losing all historical value due to government greed. Afterwards, they will claim the salvage has been a bust, and they will sell the untraceable valuables on the world black market.

After all, the Spanish (or any other government) has abandoned the property long ago. And abandoned property should go to the finder. I personally think it was idiotic to agree to such a treaty. As a minimum, the treaty should have included a sharing clause, requiring the salvager to be be paid 100% of their costs of the salvage and the research, plus a reasonable profit percentage, and then receive a share of the salvage.

38 posted on 09/26/2011 1:21:34 PM PDT by Real Cynic No More (OBAMA!!'s name is all caps as sarcasm to indicate a lack of respect, as he does not deserve it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wny

“I’ve read in the past that a warship and its contents, remains the propoerty of whatever country/navy it sailed for, but a merchant vessel is finders keepers.”

Yes you are correct, and that is what was at issue in this case. The court found that the shipwreck is the remains of a warship,and title to a warship never passes without express acknowledgement.

Also, the US Court found that it had no authority to arrest the vessel, as it was protected under sovereign immunity.

The decision goes into some interesting history: here is a link:
http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010269.pdf


39 posted on 09/26/2011 1:25:57 PM PDT by ThirdMate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
So if they stole it from the Mayans (or the Aztecs, or whomever they stole it from), it's theirs forever?

EXCELLENT POINT!

I'm of the opinion that the Spanish Government has no more right to the salvage as do the salvagers. Maybe the next find will find its way back to Peru, and then let the Spaniards try to get it again.

40 posted on 09/26/2011 1:28:16 PM PDT by Real Cynic No More (OBAMA!!'s name is all caps as sarcasm to indicate a lack of respect, as he does not deserve it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson