Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Utica Could Transform Ohio Rust Belt into Diamond Belt
Rig Zone ^ | September 23, 2011 | Karen Boman

Posted on 09/26/2011 7:01:48 AM PDT by thackney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Erik Latranyi
The latest whine from the environmentalists is that while we are seeing lots of economic activity now, it will be over in 20-30 years creating ghost-towns throughout Pennsylvania.

Twenty to 30 years? That's one generation at least that would live well. Ghost towns? We have 'em all over the West. When the gold mines gave out, people moved on and created wealth somewhere else. Some places became wealth producers in other areas of production and prospered.

The enviros protests, as usual, are ludicrous.

21 posted on 09/26/2011 9:19:29 AM PDT by Oatka ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

That would be similar to what has been found in the Eagle Ford Shale.

http://www.eia.gov/oil_gas/rpd/shaleusa9.pdf


22 posted on 09/26/2011 9:30:10 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
The latest whine from the environmentalists is that while we are seeing lots of economic activity now, it will be over in 20-30 years creating ghost-towns throughout Pennsylvania.

Well, the West is littered with ghost mining towns. The part of Ohio I grew up in has several not-quite-ghost former steel towns (when I go back "home" for high school reunions, I nearly cry at what has happened to where I grew up).

So, we may end up with some gas and oil ghost towns a few decades hence. Is that worse than not having oil and gas during those decades?

23 posted on 09/26/2011 10:41:47 AM PDT by JoeFromSidney (New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. A primer on armed revolt. Available form Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Well, by supressing business and the economy, the democrats are reducing demand.


24 posted on 09/26/2011 10:58:51 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
Drill baby Drill !

Economic benefits aside, it makes heads explode amongst the watermelon morons  

25 posted on 09/26/2011 3:35:14 PM PDT by tomkat (para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
I found another piece of information to tell you how little is known about this formation.

But according to Wachovia Securities analysts, only 16 wells for production have been drilled into the Utica so far. That's a small number in a geologic formation that covers some 170,000 square miles.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204010604576592783750697202.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

26 posted on 09/27/2011 10:38:23 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Thanks!


27 posted on 09/27/2011 5:08:24 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Time to move forward not to the center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Thank God there are now some Republicans in charge in my state of birth! I suspect under the previous Dem regime they would be passing laws at a furious rate to prevent this.


28 posted on 09/27/2011 5:13:55 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector
I was close. Rather than “up to”, it was “as much as”.

Chesapeake Energy Corp. produced as much as 1,425 barrels a day of oil and petroleum liquids at one of its first four wells in Ohio’s Utica Shale

http://fuelfix.com/blog/2011/09/28/chesapeake-reports-production-from-first-utica-shale-wells/

29 posted on 09/28/2011 12:56:08 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Yeah, I wonder what Day #2 and #3 were like. I know enough about the geology of the Northeast to be dangerous. From what I remember of the Utica, it is the equivalent to the Sylvan Shale of the Mid-Continent and Permian Basin. In those areas, it is thin and not much of a source rock. If if does work as they advertise, their stock should double in the next few months.


30 posted on 09/28/2011 6:24:57 PM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector
The Utica Shale is thicker than the Marcellus.


31 posted on 09/29/2011 4:54:49 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson