“We need a real conservative as our nominee. One who will be elected in a landslide and have the necessary coattails to gain control of the Senate and build a much larger majority in the House. “
No kidding — and who do you suppose can do that, aside from Rick Perry?
Yes, I know you are dreaming of Sarah. Some day you’ll wake up and all the rest of us can tell you “we told you so”, but that won’t help any of us, because you and people detached from reality as you are will give us Obama for four more years.
This same detachment from reality of “waiting for Fred” split the conservative vote and gave us McCain, hence Obama.
As I said before, if not Perry, it’s Romney, if Romney, it’s Obama.
Palin won’t run, if she runs she will just help Romney get the nomination, by splitting the conservative vote, and if Romney, it’s Obama.
Ho, ho, ho! Oh, boy -- marked for future use.
No waiting, Clairity, I'll tell you right now.
Godzilla's coming.
You are premature on discounting Palin. She will get in and has an excellent shot on taking the nomination. However, I’m willing to settle with Herman Cain for the moment.
Clarity, you are the fervent promoter of the loser Perry, question is why? You surely don’t believe the propaganda you post. Texas is fast becoming a cesspool, just like Kalifornia, and for some reason you think that is a way to keep the Republic intact.
You avoided the Cain threads last night like the plague, but here you are today in full force. The attact you have mounted against Cain or for that matter anyone but Perry, is “Heartless.”
Here is the truth get used to it. Not one of the current nine will be at the top of the ticket, whether Palin runs or not.
By the way, passing the buck to the Feds on issues that you know for a fact they won’t address, is dishonest to the core. It does however let you hide your true agenda. Time tested progressive move it is.