[A Navy Vet]

Yes, by all means, pull up the drawbridge and let the World have at. Oh wait, once the tyrants and run out of wars and countries to dominate, if there's world left, I wonder who they will set their eyes on next? Hmmm...Figi? Ron Paul is an unrealistic isolationist.

That said, our war against al-Queda/Taliban has kept many of those Islamic fruitcakes from creating more atrocities and we've pretty much won it - for now. But those tribal barbarians will never change. It seems to be in their DNA. Iraq is questionable.

So let's pull out of Aftganiscrap and give them a very simple message. Commit one more barbaric act on Western civilization and you are bombed into the stone age you so relish. And yes, I'm talking every man, woman, and child who support said barbarism. Better their woman and children than ours.

[9YearLurker]

I’m with you in the sense that I’d like to see us less overextended in useless, unwinnable, small-potatoes occupations and wars—while we simultaneously carry a bigger stick. If we have to do damage, we do damage—without needlessly sacrificing our men and women.

[no-to-illegals]

Have come to a conclusion concerning these wars and believe your conclusion is the only conclusion capable of winning ultimately and securing a form of peace. Also agree, there must be something in the DNA of all arabs which our side will never understand. The bottom line with arabs (imho) is does our nation want to be dominated by arabs or does our nation desire to dominate the arabs and secure peace? There will be attack after attack against the West until arabs are subdued (imho), and therefore I fully agree with you, this will ultimately lead to; Will our nation protect and defend our women and children, or will our nation protect and defend their (arab) women and children. History is about to be made no matter what the decision will be. To do nothing will result in arab domination, so another question; Does the West desire a quick death, a slow death, or does the West desire peace? Securing the peace is never easy, and knowing what form a peace will take is never known unless there is an ultimate winner in war. Then our planet normally comes back to do it all over again a few decades later. So another chapter of history begins.(imho)

I pray you will not consider this a personal attack, for it is not. I fully agree with your assessment.

[semaj]

"Commit one more barbaric act on Western civilization and you are bombed into the stone age you so relish."

Most of Afghanistan has never left the stone age in the first place.

[Dr. Bogus Pachysandra]

Vet,
That is the plan I have been talking about for some time,,, with one difference. They do anything, anything,,, they have 24 hours to evacuate their cities, because 24 hours later, they will have no cities, no gas, no electric, no bridges, no airports, no military bases,,,, etc., etc..

[gleeaikin]

Meanwhile, raw uranium has been found near Sabha in Libya. I thought Gaddafi was supposed to have gotten rid of all that. This morning I hear a report that missiles and machine guns have been transported from Libya to the Sudan. I wonder if we already have a secret mission to go destroy them, or if Obama will have the guts to do what Clinton and Reagan did and bomb them. I am also confused by Obamas move to deny statehood to Palistine.

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/UN_agency_confirms_raw_uranium_in_Libya_999.html

[rawcatslyentist]

I say we give them that message, except the bombing starts now.