I read every word you wrote, carefully.
Accusing my manner instead of my actual points is odd.
I wrote:
“DADT, if rightly applied, would simply mean that one is to do one’s duty irrespective of their inclination. If they cannot, then they should be removed from the armed forces of the United States. Clearly, there are those presently in the armed forces who haven’t accepted this, and so have remained in the armed forces under false pretenses, and they have been used by certain politicians to gain political advantage even though it clearly is harming the country. This is wrong. And I hope that the whole issue will be re-examined and changed.”
You didn’t respond to that very clear point. Instead you accused me of saying the opposite. That isn’t just odd, it’s dishonest.