I wrote:
“DADT, if rightly applied, would simply mean that one is to do one’s duty irrespective of their inclination. If they cannot, then they should be removed from the armed forces of the United States. Clearly, there are those presently in the armed forces who haven’t accepted this, and so have remained in the armed forces under false pretenses, and they have been used by certain politicians to gain political advantage even though it clearly is harming the country. This is wrong. And I hope that the whole issue will be re-examined and changed.”
You didn’t respond to that very clear point. Instead you accused me of saying the opposite. That isn’t just odd, it’s dishonest.
You misrepresent your own statements, on this very thread.
Blowing smoke is all you’re doing. Anyone can read just your comments, and mind, up this thread and see what you’re doing. Up the thread you stated that the old “Ask, tell and out the door if wrong answer” was destructive!
DADT which was implement and pushed by Clinton - a leftist piece of scum - was meant to ease the way into what we have now - open sexual perverts in the military. Even under DADT there have been tremendous problems, which you ignore.
And your method of “debate” is obfuscate, blow smoke, and when the truth is pointed out, call me names.
Typical, SOP, and I’ve seen it plenty of times over the years on FR.
I scanned over several pages of your comments and realize that other than this little thread, you have posted exclusively on religion topics for at least the last couple of years. So that is your main interest here on FR and apparently you know very little about homosexuality or the agenda.
So, my advice to you would be to study up, and you may learn something about it. If it’s not a topic that interests you, so be it. It should interest every conservative, since the agenda means the destruction of our Constitutionally protected freedoms of speech, religion and association. For starters.