[manc]

Actually civil unions are law in the UK not homosexual marriage.

The Govt and Cameron are looking at this issue right now but there is a lot of people against them getting married.

Therefore technically they were never really married and even if they were then when one goes to a country we respect their laws not they respect our laws.
We would not allow 4 muslim women for a muslim man and Saudi would not allow homosexuals .

These kind of people always think it’s about them because the media defends them and then they cry a river, well tough the majority do not agree with them and it is high time people spoke up in public against it.

[paudio]

I stand corrected. My question, however, stands: does the company state that they only cater to the heterosexual honeymooners? And does 'honeymoon' only applies to those who legally married--and not to civil union? When my wife and I took advantage of such honeymoon package, they didn't ask for our wedding certificate. So, anyone can claim about honeymooning whether they are really just married or not.

I'm not going to go to the issue whether it's perception or fact. Each of us has a lot of stories about how hotels/restaurants treat us badly, and both sides (hotel/restaurant and us) can argue until the cow comes home whether they're perception or fact, and God knows who's right.

My point is, the company should state that they cater specifically to heterosexual honeymooners. Otherwise, they have to prepare such thing happens. And if it does, they need to treat the customers equally. It may be against the law for a company to say they cater only to heterosexual couples, but I think companies should be allowed to cater customers to their competency--in this case heterosexual couples.