They will use every dirty sneaky tactic they can think of.
I can certainly agree with that.
When I lived in FL I worked off and on with a pro-gun group that lobbied the state legislature, the majority of which (the legislature that is) at that time tended to lean toward an anti-2nd Amendment rights stance. I soon discovered that our anti-gun opponents in that fight were capable of employing any tactic whether legal or illegal, fair or foul, truth or bald-faced lie, that they thought might help them reach their goal of convincing the state's lawmakers that it was necessary to impose more and stricter gun control laws on the people in order for FL to reverse it's rapidly rising murder rate. It was a close contest in the early 1980s but we finally won out against the antis and the oppressive laws they wanted were rejected by the FL legislature.
And to top that off, later in that decade, 1986 IIRC, our earlier efforts were rewarded when a FL legislature more favorable to 2nd Amendment rights passed one of the first, if not THE first, shall-issue concealed carry laws in the nation. FL's liberal Democrat governor at that time, Bob Graham, vetoed the bill, however Republican governor Bob Martinez signed an even better bill into law the following year.
Enactment of FL's CCW law seems to have inspired similar efforts by pro-gun orgs in many other states to have shall-issue CC laws enacted in their states. Not too long after FL's law was enacted several of those states also enacted shall-issue CCW laws, and today only Obama's home state IL totally bans concealed or open carry. Some of those CCW laws were enacted at least partially as a result of the success of FL's law at reducing FL's murder rate by approximately 25% within only a couple of years following it's enactment IIRC.
My role in that successful endeavor was ridiculously minuscule and unimportant compared to that of most other participants. But even so I like to think that I contributed at least a microscopically tiny bit to the success of that ad hoc group's fight against well organized and liberally funded anti-gunners. Patting one's self on the back for having participated to even a very, very small extent in the achievement of a worthy objective is quite uncomfortable, and also very much inappropriate in my particular case. But OTOH it shows that even an extremely small amount of effort such as that which I expended can help make a difference in our fight for full restoration of our Constitutionally guaranteed rights in every aspect of life and government that the grand old document touches on.