Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Alleges Full Tilt Poker Was Ponzi Scheme

Posted on 09/20/2011 5:09:21 PM PDT by JosephMama

The U.S. Justice Department on Tuesday accused poker celebrities Howard Lederer and Christopher Ferguson among other executives of a major poker website of defrauding poker players out of more than $300 million.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
I used to play on this site and have my doubts about the "ponzi scheme" argument. More likely rather, the US govt had nothing to go on by shutting down the sites so had to reach for an accusation such as this.
1 posted on 09/20/2011 5:09:24 PM PDT by JosephMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JosephMama

Sorry forgot the link:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904106704576582741398633386.html


2 posted on 09/20/2011 5:10:33 PM PDT by JosephMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JosephMama

So Full Tilt Poker not a DNC donor? What non-Union?


3 posted on 09/20/2011 5:11:28 PM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JosephMama

Were the proceeds being used to fund Social Security?


4 posted on 09/20/2011 5:13:31 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JosephMama

>> executives of a major poker website of defrauding poker players out of more than $300 million.

Pikers. I’m being forced to participate in a giant Ponzi scheme that is defrauding MILLIONS of Americans out of a hundred TRILLION.


5 posted on 09/20/2011 5:14:31 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JosephMama

Actually, the term “Ponzi scheme” is a pretty good shorthand way of describing what was going on (it appears there are arguments about what makes something a “true” Ponzi scheme, but the technical aspects aren’t really relevant here).

FTP was saying that they held players’ money in a separate account. They didn’t. Players had stated balances of $390 million on 3/31/11; FTP had $60 million in the bank. The people who ran FTP and had ownership interests in the software company that “licensed” the software to FTP were pulling out $10 million a month, even after it was apparent that FTP was under water and they kept taking the money out all the way to the bitter end.

DOJ went after “illegal” online poker financial transactions and came across something else in addition - fraud, Ponzi scheme, whatever you want to call it. So crazy.


6 posted on 09/20/2011 5:20:24 PM PDT by rockvillem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JosephMama
...U.S. Alleges Full Tilt Poker Was Ponzi Scheme...

I played there too. How can a game be a Ponzi scheme? There's no guarantee of a return.

I agree with you, they're reaching.

7 posted on 09/20/2011 5:21:16 PM PDT by FReepaholic (I'm a lumberjack and I'm ok.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JosephMama

They must not be letting the negros win. Go get em Eric. Those honkies are evil.


8 posted on 09/20/2011 5:21:23 PM PDT by taillightchaser (The last hope for America--2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockvillem
...FTP was saying that they held players’ money in a separate account. They didn’t. Players had stated balances of $390 million on 3/31/11; FTP had $60 million in the bank...

Then it was simple theft, not a Ponzi scheme.

9 posted on 09/20/2011 5:23:20 PM PDT by FReepaholic (I'm a lumberjack and I'm ok.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JosephMama

That’s amazing! I read a book once but can’t tell you how the publishing business works or how much percentage the writer gets and how books are distributed.


10 posted on 09/20/2011 5:26:34 PM PDT by fish hawk (Don't worry about old age, it doesn't last that long!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JosephMama

“U.S. Alleges Full Tilt Poker Was Ponzi Scheme”

that’s just going to scare seniors


11 posted on 09/20/2011 5:34:31 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Thank you, Bob!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic
Then it was simple theft, not a Ponzi scheme.

The thread about this on the poker site 2+2 often got derailed by arguments about what is, or is not, a Ponzi scheme. As to the Euro players who were induced to deposit after Black Friday, it looks like it might have been a Ponzi scheme based on the facts alleged in the complaint about FTP's financial situation (i.e., their money was needed to pay off current players and there was no prospect of repayment without new funds coming in); as to US depositors it was just a garden-variety fraud. It doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things - there was fraudulent activity going on that could easily rise to a criminal level and that had nothing to do with the legality or illegality of online poker, the financial mechanics of funding it, etc.
12 posted on 09/20/2011 5:35:15 PM PDT by rockvillem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic

did you read the article????

it was a Ponzi Scheme the same as Madoff’s thieving was a Ponzi Scheme


13 posted on 09/20/2011 5:35:42 PM PDT by is_is (VP Dad of Sgt. G - My Hero - "Sleep Well America......Your Marines have your Back")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic
How can a game be a Ponzi scheme?

I played at Full Tilt too, and liked them. I'm not sure about the government charges, but it's a bit naive to suggest that they might not have been engaged in fraud.

ML/NJ

14 posted on 09/20/2011 5:53:05 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

The reason they would have to engage in such fraud would be the result of the unconstitutional Port Security Bill signed by Bushie, not by malicious strategies to bilk players. These guys make money whether you win or lose.


15 posted on 09/20/2011 6:01:44 PM PDT by JosephMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: is_is
...did you read the article????...

What? Are you supposed to read the article before posting? Dang.

16 posted on 09/20/2011 6:06:01 PM PDT by FReepaholic (I'm a lumberjack and I'm ok.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JosephMama

Why would you believe that an online poker site was on the up and up to start with? I’m surprised they weren’t stealing identities too


17 posted on 09/20/2011 6:09:35 PM PDT by Figment ("A communist is someone who reads Marx.An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx" R Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

I played there too. (Play money) Shame it shut down because it was superior to the alternate sites.


18 posted on 09/20/2011 6:10:28 PM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Figment

Because I have played many games on that site as well as others. I never had any problem cashing out with any site.

I also know a couple of people who run house games and they make plenty of money by having a game that is on the “up and up”. Otherwise no one would play.


19 posted on 09/20/2011 6:14:28 PM PDT by JosephMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic

Hmmm....if players have more money in their accounts than the company has in reserve then it’s sort of a Ponzi scheme. Now if nobody requests to cash out they’re OK. But now that charges have been filed, probably every player with money in their account is trying to cash out. The company doesn’t have enough to cover.

Maybe you would prefer to call it “fractional reserve banking.” (Although if the people running the company are pulling money out of the company every month, I think that comparison fails too.)

Although I really have to wonder about the business model.
You would think that the people running the company would have found a different way to extract their profit. Maybe a percentage take on every pot, or a buy-in for tournaments or something. Then once that was paid whatever the players won could be kept in individual accounts.


20 posted on 09/20/2011 6:41:57 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson