Posted on 09/20/2011 1:41:43 PM PDT by lbryce
I posted these already but I’m going to again, so they’re on this page of the thread. These are a must read for anyone who needs the facts about what mentally ill sex perverts do in the military. Claims that the EU or NATO has them with on problem is a lie.
Ten Reasons to Oppose an LGBT Law or Policy for the Military
The Center for Military Readiness ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608259/posts
Senate Testimony: European Militaries Are Not Role Models for U.S.
The Center for Military Readiness ^ | 3/22/2010
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608228/posts
Rates of Homosexual Assault in the Military Are Disproportionately High
FRC ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608306/posts
In Support the 1993 Law Stating that Homosexuals are not Eligible to Serve in the Military
CMR ^ | July 23, 2008 | Elaine Donnelly
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608370/posts
THE REAL PENTAGON POLL: 91% OF SERVICE MEMBERS REJECT HOMOSEXUAL LEADERS - 1 IN 4 WOULD QUIT
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2635458/posts
MILITARY: Marines lead opposition to repeal of dont ask, dont tell
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2635350/posts
Mullen: Troops Who Balk at Change in Gay Service Policy Can Find Other Work
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2636350/posts
and now a Navy top guy comes out saying the Navy is being hurt by PC.
Good point Mike. It’s been discussed before but that survey was written in such a way to elicit PC responses. I received one as a military spouse so I saw it myself. Plus you have the “fear factor” for respondents if they are serving. There was pressure to be PC before this.
DADT worked fine because sexuality shouldn’t be anybody’s business in the first place. It’s just not relevant. My husband definitely worked with gay military members and who really thinks that a large percentage of women in the military aren’t gay? Like police and fire, it’s just the type of job that attracts lesbians. Well, except for all the women getting knocked up on Navy ships for example—another bright idea by the way—.
Anyway, my point is that it’s really nobody’s business and if you don’t shove it in most people’s face they really don’t care what you do in your private life, which is exactly as it should be.
The US military tests individual service members every 2 years for hiv.
Recruiters have been told to aggressively recruit homosexuals.
There are presently 19,000 hiv positive service members.
A person can have hiv for up to 90 days and not test positive on some or all tests. There is much conflict on the accuracy and standardazation of tests. So potentially a medic could have hiv for 2 yrs.3 months and easily pass it on to hundreds of personnel if in a combat situation.
In a mass casualty situation where blood is taken from any and everyone and used immediately or buddy transfusions occur the potential for transmitting hiv is astronomical.
I meant to ping that article out and now I don’t know where it is. If you see it could you ping me to it?
This is freaking insane. The leftists/faggots want to destroy the military. Every two years. And fags are really pushing to be able to donate blood. These two comments need repeating:
A person can have hiv for up to 90 days and not test positive on some or all tests. There is much conflict on the accuracy and standardazation of tests. So potentially a medic could have hiv for 2 yrs.3 months and easily pass it on to hundreds of personnel if in a combat situation.
In a mass casualty situation where blood is taken from any and everyone and used immediately or buddy transfusions occur the potential for transmitting hiv is astronomical.
1. Recruiters aren’t legally allowed to ask the sexual orientation of recruits (that was the whole issue in the 90s).
2. Blood donation screening as far as I know still asks if you engage in sexual contact with prostitutes, men, multiple people, etc.
3. What MOS were you?
1 Marines have a recruiting booth at homosexual community center this weekend. Speaks for itself. 2 People lie. 3 not relevant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.