That is irrelevant to the illegal alien/border issue.
What we need is a better overall policy.
This is what we need. It would be effective and inexpensive.
“It’s not our business to run his campaign and to figure out his polticial strategy, spin or whatever on any issue,” she said. “We want to make sure that our colleagues around the country in the Tea Party grassroots movement have their questions answered.
Sounds like they already have Perry's number!
Latin Americans need to be in a separate category, because then we could separate people who came here to make a few bucks cutting your lawn from the harmful immigrants (whether legal or illegal). These would be...Muslims, specially privileged by Hussein.
Also, there are a number of criminal Russians and Chinese who have slipped in - and they’re all probably legal or were legal and have overstayed their visas, like Zero’s family members...
Increase the legal number of Latin Americans, get ID from them and track their dates to make sure they renew, and then really crack down on the thousands of Muslims who are streaming across our borders and, what’s worse, arriving legally at JFK.
A few picky points.
High tech surveillance only means squat if boots can be mustered on the ground quickly enough to intercept any incursion. I doubt the US is willing to bomb anybody in North America with drones, or even have robo-guns. Robo tear gas maybe? And what do you do if Mexicans try to flash mob the robo-guarded border simultaneously at, say, a hundred different places?
The “anchor baby” issue will require constitutional amendment to remedy. Chances of getting the USSC to reverse policy are slim to none, and slim just left town. By itself it doesn’t mean that much anyhow. By the time a newborn anchored baby could sponsor its parents, an eternity of political time has passed.
Obama and his gang have the most novel solution. Ruin the country and run it into the ground so much that nobody wants to be here.