Replies

Jesse Jackson said a while back that they’d lose 11% of their vote count in some precincts if photo id was required to vote.

This is why I'm closely following Pennsylvania's plan to award electoral votes by congressional district instead of "winner takes all". If passed, it would mean that vote-fraud in Philly would only affect Philly's electoral votes (which the Dem would get regardless), rather than throwing the whole state to the Dem.

Wisconsin, Michigan, and other states with large Dem cities should follow suit.

36 posted on 09/20/2011 8:22:25 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (When you've only heard lies your entire life, the truth sounds insane.)

I think apportioning EVs by congressional district is a good idea, for the very fact that you mentioned - it isolates voter fraud, usually to the districts where the dems would win anyway.

Someone on FR equated this with the National Popular Vote movement and opposed it greatly, but in reality, it is the EXACT OPPOSITE of the NPV.

39 posted on 09/20/2011 8:34:55 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)