Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pumped-storage system helps handle power demand (consumes more power than it produces)
Allatona mirror ^ | 9-18-11 | Greg Bock

Posted on 09/19/2011 12:12:21 PM PDT by Brookhaven

At the edge of the tailwater of the Kinzua Dam on the Allegheny River in Warren County sits a hydroelectric generating station.

But the Seneca Pumped-Storage Hydro Generating Station isn't powered by the water flowing through the dam, like the more familiar hydroelectric projects such as Hoover Dam, but rather from a 2 billion gallon reservoir perched some 800 feet above, among the trees of the Allegheny National Forest.

"Pumped-storage hydro is a different animal," said Mark Durbin, spokesman for the facility's operator, First Energy Generation Corp.

Durbin pointed out the station can generate 451 megawatts of electricity, but only for 10 hours a day. It then takes 14 hours to pump water back up to the perfectly round upper reservoir, about the size of a small NASCAR track, to start the process again, he said.

The station also uses more electricity than it generates, so at a glance it might seem absurd. But for those in the business of keeping the lights on, it's a valuable asset that helps the utility make money and meet the fluctuating demands of the power grid, noted civil engineer Rick Miller, who works for the Nebraska-based firm HDR Inc.

(Excerpt) Read more at altoonamirror.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: stupidity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: dila813; Brookhaven
This is being developed as a way to story energy for when wind turbines are not active.

why don’t they just use a gas generator? It doesn’t use as much power and can be switched on when ever needed.

The Seneca project has been on the planning boards for about 20 years. It was originally planned when gas was expensive and old coal plants were getting expensive to run to supply electricity during peak demand periods (usually during the day)

The idea was to run your efficient big plants at 100% round the clock and use excess production from the large modern plants to pump up the reservoir at night. Then run the hydro generators during the day to produce for peak demand.

What this article is doing is trying to produce interest in completing the project as a Green Technology project.

21 posted on 09/19/2011 12:33:11 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
This sort of thing was initially sold as peak load generation, storing power by moving water during off-peak times. Here is an example: (note the dates of operation) Back Creek, Virginia
22 posted on 09/19/2011 12:35:39 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
The other thing I remember about this project is that it would be normally unmanned; it would remotely operated.

A big advantage money saver. A peaking plant must be manned 24/7.

23 posted on 09/19/2011 12:37:38 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Woodman
"divert the water further upstream via an aqueduct to the reservoir"

Too Roman.

24 posted on 09/19/2011 12:38:46 PM PDT by Deaf Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

It’s not a scam, it’s a battery. And yes, it’s a net energy consumer because all forms of storing and transferring power are lossy.

The reason rates are higher during the day is because of demand. The whole point of a “battery” system like this is be able to supply additional power during peak demand periods without having to increase the generating capacity of power plants.


25 posted on 09/19/2011 12:39:07 PM PDT by kevkrom (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

***The station also uses more electricity than it generates, ****

These have been around for quite a while. The way it works is when you have a “peak” demand, the cost of electricity goes way up. The gates are opened and the water flows through the turbines to produce this electricity to take advantage of this high cost time.

At night, when the price of electricity falls, the pumps are turned on allowing the water to be pumped back to the upper pond at a lower cost. The electricity to operate these pumps comes from other power plant sources.

The turbines produce high cost electricity during the day.

The pumps use MORE low cost electricity to pump the water back to the upper pond at night.


26 posted on 09/19/2011 12:39:42 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name. See my home page, if you dare! NEW PHOTOS & PAINTINGS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken
Down the road we'll get some relief to the problem when we have devices in line with our major appliances that regulate power demand, not just an on/off switch.

An example ~ your A/C is running. You are not running in and out and nobody is at home, yet, you don't want to come home to a hot steamy jungle that takes 6 hours to cool that evening. The A/C controller could switch over to a Relative Value of 10 degrees less than outside ambient rather than running on the Absolute Value of 70 degrees.

Your washer/dryer could easily be regulated to deal with variable power requirements depending on humidity levels (hey, mine already does eh).

All of our expensive LED lighting systems could be made even more efficient with simple motion detectors (turning them off when no one is around).

And so forth.

27 posted on 09/19/2011 12:41:11 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
It keeps them from having to build another power plant to cover peak loads.

You have two choices: enough generating power to cover peak loads, which only last a few hours, or less generating power and a method of storing excess power for peak periods.

My bet is that this is cheaper than building another partially plant that would be idle most of the time.

Plus, you don't just turn plants on and off. You have to keep them idling during the off-peak hours.

This isn't new, and it's not rocket science.

28 posted on 09/19/2011 12:44:32 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Palin is coming, and the Tea Party is coming with her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
You don’t seem to understand why there is a need for this type of facility. I will try to explain, but reading the other posts should also answer your question.

A large percentage of what you pay per kilowatt is for the infrastructure used to produce it. This type of power storage allows the utilities to have smaller generation facilities which are cheaper to build and run at higher efficiency. The reason electricity is cheaper at night is because there is less demand at that time because there is excess generation capacity. This operation solves a problem. Without it not everyone would be able to turn on all their air conditioners at once during the day because it would overload the system.

As far as profit goes... this is a perfect example of capitalism at work. Entrepreneurs and investors who solve problems and allow others to live in comfort should be rewarded.

29 posted on 09/19/2011 12:46:52 PM PDT by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

The current green movement possibly started with the defeat of ConEd’s application to build a pump storage system above the Hudson River on Storm King mountain. In the 70’s the Federal Power commission denied them a license to build after being sued by Historic Hudson Society and others. This one project could have offered relief to millions of users in the East and reduced their electric bills..


30 posted on 09/19/2011 12:47:28 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
Even old farmers used that trick back before public utilities made us energy junkies.

Funny how Al Gore never mentions that fact.

31 posted on 09/19/2011 12:52:18 PM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (How will the Rats keep power? They cheat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

I think that you did not mean to respond to me. I just pointed out that it is not new technology. I understand it clearly and do not think that it is crazy in any way.


32 posted on 09/19/2011 12:53:09 PM PDT by loungitude (The truth hurts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
combined power generation
33 posted on 09/19/2011 1:09:30 PM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." Richard Feynman father of Quantum Physics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Woodman

The company is based in Nebraska, there is not much grade there, you may be talking about diverting water from another state to get adequate elevation.


34 posted on 09/19/2011 1:11:22 PM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

IIRC it is three KW to pump up, and two KW generation on the way down. Therefore the cost per KW nightime had to be 2/3 or less the cost per KW daytime.

The math worked in 1975, not sure now with fairly efficient gas fired combined cycle generation widely installed.


35 posted on 09/19/2011 1:11:56 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
run your efficient big plants at 100% round the clock

I read about 50% of a power plant's output is lost as waste heat at the plant. Instead of just pumping water up I wonder if some of it could be airlifted up using large evaporation ponds putting the waste heat to use. Natural solar heating would help too. When electricity is used in the city it also turns into waste heat. Possibly spraying water in a city would reduce the urban heat island effect while increasing rainfall and hydro power downwind. Adding nucleotides to the air would induce cloud formation providing shade and cooling for large areas during the day, and when wanted could provide a blanket effect at night.

36 posted on 09/19/2011 1:12:18 PM PDT by Reeses (At work avoid small talk about politicized subjects such as the weather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Exactly right. A peaker plant operates on the marginal rate difference, essentially time-shifting energy from off-peak production to times when demand (and thus wholesale cost) is highest. I’d like to see analysis of a wind-hydro peaker, in which wind would be used to pump water into a reservoir which would then be used to drive a hydro to produce electricity when needed. It seems vastly simpler and with much greater capacity than electrical methods, e.g. capacitor or battery banks.


37 posted on 09/19/2011 1:15:52 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
The Salt River Project which serves the Phoenix area utilizes pumped storage units at Horse Mesa and Mormon Flat Dams. Mormon flat Dam contains Canyon Lake, which I introduced my grandsons to yesterday. You can see it in the background:


38 posted on 09/19/2011 1:16:19 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (I never win at Scrable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The future is yours:

http://www.bing.com/shopping/basic-programmable-thermostat-rth221b1000/p/CD64CEB5142F129258BF?q=programmable+thermostat&lpq=programmable%20thermostat&FORM=HURE

For $18.97 you can install a programmable thermostat. You can come home to a cool house without paying to cool it all day.


39 posted on 09/19/2011 1:16:54 PM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

No.

The Nebraska company is HDR, an Omaha-based consulting engineering firm for hydroelectric generation.

http://www.hdrinc.com/locations/united-states/nebraska


40 posted on 09/19/2011 1:18:52 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson