Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Beelzebubba

100 posted on 09/19/2011 12:03:52 PM PDT by PilotDave (No, really, you just can't make this stuff up!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: PilotDave; All
Is this post the trim tab separation? I have heard of this photo, is this it?

Note the thick chord of the Elevator vs the Stabilizer. My guess they were looking for greater strength via the thickness as well as maybe getting the airflow not to separate and as stay laminar as it went over the gap, by causing it to accelerate. More effective elevator for a given span is my guess. I have seen this technique used on one Acrobatic Aircraft's Ailerons...

104 posted on 09/19/2011 12:35:55 PM PDT by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: PilotDave

Thanks for the photo post. The diagonal angle of the stress marks suggests that the rear fuselage sheared with an upward force by the wing, and downward by the tail. Which is consistent with loss of a trim tab operation that normally provides upward force at the tail to counteract excessive lift at speed, and when lost would generate major downforce.

I’m not an aviation expert, but I did earn an engineering degree once upon a time.

Maybe a simpler way of looking at it is that this is what happens when positive Gs exceed the airframe’s capability, but the wings are strong enough not to fall off.


124 posted on 09/19/2011 2:16:19 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Are you better off now than you were four trillion dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson