To: Iam1ru1-2
This is going to be a bit shocking, but hear me out.
I think it’s actually a good thing, in the big scheme of things, that the judge ruled this way,
because he just ripped down the facade that there is some difference between killing the unborn and killing a newborn.
Now, it’s up to society to respond either with revulsion or acceptance of infanticide.
3 posted on
09/16/2011 1:37:58 PM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: MrB
there is no sharp distinction between the foetus and the newborn baby.
That’s what I’ve been saying for years. Although in support of the unborn.
To: MrB
Not shocking at all! This IS great news. Liberals are getting caught in the imbecility of their own opinions. We have to hang them around their neck. Publicizing this incident goes a long way towards this goal.
9 posted on
09/16/2011 1:49:02 PM PDT by
mwilli20
(BO. Making communists proud all over the world.)
To: MrB
I totally agree with you. If society isn’t outraged at abortion then they shouldn’t be outraged at murder after birth.
10 posted on
09/16/2011 1:50:23 PM PDT by
CodeToad
(Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
To: MrB
I agree with you 100%. While the story and the court decision are dreadful, there is an upside. Along the same lines, google the following essay title in quotes: “We Do Abortions Here”. You'll be appalled by the content of the essay, but you'll be happy that the author — an abortion clinic worker — tells the TRUTH about abortion. The judge in this case is simply being consistent with the logic behind abortion rights: it doesn't matter if the fetus/baby is a human being, so long as its mother wants it dead.
12 posted on
09/16/2011 1:54:37 PM PDT by
utahagen
To: MrB
From the Article: “...Justice Joanne Veit of the Alberta Court of Queens Bench.”
This so-called Judge is a she.
“Now, its up to society to respond either with revulsion or acceptance of infanticide.”
Now, I think it’s up to the people, through their elected representatives, to write a new “infanticide” law.
13 posted on
09/16/2011 1:57:02 PM PDT by
ngat
To: MrB
I agree with you, unfortunately that scale can tip either way. Many people would of course rather see abortion over infanticide and decide “better one than the other” and become even more accepting of the practice.
17 posted on
09/16/2011 2:02:18 PM PDT by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: MrB
your logic is poison, the epitomy of sophistry.
18 posted on
09/16/2011 2:09:03 PM PDT by
the invisib1e hand
(...then they came for the guitars, and we kicked their sorry faggot asses into the dust)
To: MrB
I hear you, but it’s still appalling.
24 posted on
09/16/2011 2:50:15 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: MrB
You’re right, there is no difference.
27 posted on
09/16/2011 3:22:17 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson