Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jessduntno

I don’t think anyone is suggesting they raise the age tomorrow.


I’m suggesting that aside from avoiding disruption to current and imminent retirees, the age should be floated annually to ensure ZERO BORROWING to pay SS benefits.

Delaying 15 years will simply kick the can (accumulate trillions in debt), and screw those who are paying in now, who have no hope of enjoying the same benefits of those they’re funding.


25 posted on 09/16/2011 8:20:49 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Are you better off now than you were four trillion dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Beelzebubba

“I’m suggesting that aside from avoiding disruption to current and imminent retirees, the age should be floated annually to ensure ZERO BORROWING to pay SS benefits.”

That’s where privatization comes in.That becomes your choice and leaves room for higher profit (and loss, presumably, for risk takers and those that have private funds to bolster retirement) to be kept from being “raided.”


32 posted on 09/16/2011 8:31:13 AM PDT by jessduntno (Obama shanks. America tanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson