Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fluffdaddy

“Dr. K is, as usual, confused. Social Security isn’t much more mandatory than the classic Ponzi scheme.”

You mean, except one is voluntary and the other is mandatory?

The key phrase in your contention is “as long as people keep voting to be forced.” The similarity to the Ponzi scheme is that the suckers don’t know their money is gone until it’s too late. And for many over 50, that is what has happened.

SS CAN be fixed for...by voluntary privatization, so that the suckers like me that have paid in for a long, long time don’t lose everything they put in and younger participants who have paid in something will get that something out. Some will volunteer to put some in (just as some overpay income taxes to get a rebate at the end of the year, even though the rate of return is dismal) even though they know it will NOT perform well. The fix, as you say, involves not promoting it as a “ promise to care for everyone.”


21 posted on 09/16/2011 8:09:21 AM PDT by jessduntno (Obama shanks. America tanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: jessduntno

SS CAN be fixed for...by voluntary privatization, so that the suckers like me that have paid in for a long, long time don’t lose everything they put in and younger participants who have paid in something will get that something out.


It sounds like you assume that there is some money in the pot that hasn’t been looted. unfortunately, it’s all gone, and all your taxes (and more) are needed to maintain current payouts.


42 posted on 09/16/2011 9:21:18 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Are you better off now than you were four trillion dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson