Ping.
Where is the link?
It would be nice to see a link and a little more information about the limiting of political speech in a paint removal bill.
Could you flesh this out a bit.....
I thought it hadn't been written yet. Is it online?
Probably a transcript of the speech.
You must be watching Cavuto. I just seen it too
regulations...smegulations....we’re going to regulate HIM out of office!
Throw me a bone here. (aka...link...info)
No it is not the jobs bill. It is a speed reader going on through the 25,000 pages of regulations now in existance, and giving some examples.
I heard that one congressman tried to read the bill, and woke up in a tub full of ice with his kidney missing and somebody wrote on the mirror, welcome to the world of AIDS. From that day forward, he wore a hook where his hand should be.
Did I hear Barry say this bill “will save each middle class family $1,500.00”? How can this be if middle class families don’t pay any tax? Or is he labeling someone making $250,000.00 a year middle class?
Nevil Chamberlin Obama
This should be doa as a slaver bill not a jobs bill.
I would like to read this part. It is unconstitutional, no matter what it says. And it will never pass Congress!!!
Where are the jackasses on our side screaming this in front of a camera and microphone? If this is true, it’s a no brainer to win the public on examples, holding such a document...I’d suspect it isn’t 25000 pages but rather 25000 words. I hope we aren’t stupid enough to make such a mistake. Scream about paint removal being no way having to do with jobs, but stealing freedom. Another useful line is, “We are not China, we have freedom”.
This bill is joke with so many poison pills daring the GOP the vote it down. The GOP should not even take it up.
Where are the jackasses on our side screaming this in front of a camera and microphone? If this is true, it’s a no brainer to win the public on examples, holding such a document...I’d suspect it isn’t 25000 pages but rather 25000 words. I hope we aren’t stupid enough to make such a mistake. Scream about paint removal being no way having to do with jobs, but stealing freedom. Another useful line is, “We are not China, we have freedom”.
You mean the Monday afternoon Jobsageddon speech? Or the last Thursday evening Jobsageddon speech?
pabianice wrote:
WTH was that thin pamphlet Obama waved at the camera when giving his Jobsageddon speech?
OK, There were two things here. First, there is the American Jobs Act which is what you saw The Won waving around yesterday. That's the bill he told Congress last Thursday that they must pass immediately. Apparently, he was trying to go beyond Pelosi's "You have to pass the bill so we can see what's in it." The new Democrat plan is, "You have to pass the bill so we can write it." That's what last Thursday's speech sounded like to me.
Then, there's regulations. Regulations don't get written until after the law has been passed and is being implemented. There are no regulations from the "American Jobs Act" yet because the act hasn't been passed yet and signed into law by Obama.
I think, the speed reader on Cavuto today was reading >25,000 pages of regulations from something else. Perhaps from the Health Care law, or perhaps from a single month (that's about right for this administration for a "normal" month).
Still, fox is getting focused these days on some of the regulations that are killing business in this country.
I'll take the opportunity to plug my idea on this. I've already sent this to my (RINO Establishement) Republican Congress Critter. I suggest others should pass this up to their congres critters as well:
My proposal would have to be passed by Congress and signed by a President. It has zero chance of actually becoming law, but here it is:
That's really the only way we will be freed from these regulations.
Regulations are not Laws Act
No regulation proposed by the Executive Branch or any agency thereof shall have the force of law until it is passed by a majority of both houses of Congress and signed into law by the President.
All regulations currently documented in the "Code of Federal Regulations" will sunset 5 years after the passage of this act, unless those regulations are presented to Congress and passed by a majority in both houses of the Congress and signed into law by the President.
The Constitution states “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” For many years, the Executive branch has been exercising legislative powers through regulations and subjecting the people of this country to new laws with no accountability to the voters. This is the heart of the problem.
My proposal would start to undo that damage and address the fundamental threat to our liberty from executive regulations.
Republicans would rather have the political issue and nibble back at the regulations a few at a time than address the real issue. Besides, when they get control of the Congress and the Presidency, Republicans will use "their turn" to further their favorite regulations and abuse and usurp powers not granted to the executive in the Constitution. They won't stop it because they want the power when they get "their turn."