Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attorneys say Righthaven presenting judge a ‘false choice’
Las Vegas Sun ^ | 13 sept 2011 | Steve Green

Posted on 09/13/2011 5:34:20 AM PDT by rellimpank

In another theatrical diatribe against Righthaven LLC, defense attorneys say the Las Vegas company presented a federal judge with a “false choice” with its warning it may shut down or declare bankruptcy.

Righthaven is the newspaper copyright lawsuit filer that last year teamed with the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the Denver Post to sue over online infringements involving content from those newspapers.

After filing 275 lawsuits in 18 months, and collecting what are believed to be hundreds of thousands of dollars in settlements, the company’s litigation campaign is stalled by court rulings finding it lacked standing to sue over R-J material, as well as the loss of the Post as a client.

(Excerpt) Read more at vegasinc.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: righthaven

1 posted on 09/13/2011 5:34:24 AM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger; 2nd amendment mama; Jim Robinson

—ping—


2 posted on 09/13/2011 5:36:15 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Jim, get your suit in early before they run out of cash. Go after the lawyer himself. If you and others can show fraud you can get your money back and then some.


3 posted on 09/13/2011 5:40:25 AM PDT by PastorBooks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
After filing 275 lawsuits in 18 months, and collecting what are believed to be hundreds of thousands of dollars in settlements, the company’s litigation campaign is stalled by court rulings finding it lacked standing to sue over R-J material, as well as the loss of the Post as a client.

Well, duh!

Aren't these the putzes who tried to buy up publications then sue people on the basis of copyright infringement for actions that had already happened?

What idiot allowed them standing to sue based on was a retroactive act in the first place?

4 posted on 09/13/2011 5:45:17 AM PDT by MamaTexan (Only an arrogant asshat WOULDN'T wear a tie to the Arlington Memorial Service!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
a retroactive act in the first place

Interesting phrase, a bit like "Dejavu all over again."?

5 posted on 09/13/2011 6:07:56 AM PDT by super7man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank; All

Bankrupt? From their mouthpiece to God’s ears.

As if that makes a difference under the law. They should be gone, man, and nobody encouraged to follow in their footsteps.


6 posted on 09/13/2011 6:57:36 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: super7man
Interesting phrase, a bit like "Dejavu all over again."?

LOL!

Prettymuch.... yeah.

7 posted on 09/13/2011 7:50:40 AM PDT by MamaTexan (If it works in theory but not in practice, then it's not a theory...... but a failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson