[Future Snake Eater]

Perry was his own worst enemy. He was for strong border protection before he was against it, only he’s for it now, but not anything physical like a fence, but illegals should be allowed to get in-state tuition, but he’s really strong on the border issue...come on.

And the Gardisil thing...he did that to himself 100%. Santorum was right—why wasn’t there an “opt-in”? Why was this such a tremendous emergency that he didn’t wait for the state legislature? Was Gardisil illegal in TX before Perry’s order? Were girls 12-13 years of age dropping dead left and right until he sprang into action? That mentality along with Romney and his Obamacare-Lite plan really do prove Bachmann’s point that neither are going to be serious about taking out Obamacare. They want to control you as much as any other leftist.

I was impressed by Perry in the last debate. This one...I don’t know. He’s all over the map on some VERY important issues.

[Ditter]

There was most defiantly an “opt out” on Gardisel. I have heard him say before that the reason for the word “mandate” was so the state would pay for the vaccine. I know someone who would defiantly have benefited from the vaccine at 12. By age 15 she was infected. Parents were outraged at the suggestion that their innocent little girls would become sexually active, but it happens, every day.

[9YearLurker]

Oh, and Perry’s against e-verify too.

Could he possibly be a worse candidate on the issue?