Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Future Snake Eater
There was most defiantly an “opt out” on Gardisel. I have heard him say before that the reason for the word “mandate” was so the state would pay for the vaccine. I know someone who would defiantly have benefited from the vaccine at 12. By age 15 she was infected. Parents were outraged at the suggestion that their innocent little girls would become sexually active, but it happens, every day.
18 posted on 09/13/2011 6:45:35 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Ditter

I know there’s an “opt-out”, Perry has said so in both debates. Santorum had a great point in both debates—”Why wasn’t there an ‘opt-in’?” And why did he feel this sudden urgency that couldn’t wait for the legislature? Why was he forcing people to do it, burying the “opt-out” in the fine print of his magnanimous decree?


25 posted on 09/13/2011 8:49:03 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Don't stop. Keep moving!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson