Based on this article, I guess Ron Paul didn’t say anything interesting .... hmmmmmmmmm?
RP is waffling on issues on which he used to be clear and right. Oddly enough, Perry is coming across as braver about standing on principle than RP. Because I am well acquainted with both, I find that astonishing. RP is throwing away his only real strength - his reputation as a straight-talker. That’s too bad because, although he has no chance at the nomination, there are many domestic issues that he could have used the debate forum to educate voters about.
Cain was sharp and had some good lines; Perry did as well as anyone, but he needs to lose thebrown suit (Is Naomi Wolff on his campaign payroll?); Bachmann on the whole was stronger and looked better; Huntsman is consolidating the Eddie Haskell base; Mittens is almost good - if you could trust him; Newt had a few great moments; Santorum...why is he there again?