I would support that as a matter of compassion except that is what life insurance is for.
We’re expecting Big Brother to take care of us instead of purchasing inexpensive protection for our own families.
Did you know that if a person of suitable age retires and goes on Social Security, his (or her with the help of science) MINOR CHILDREN are entitled to a check too?
So someone can voluntarily retire and the taxpayers get to foot the bill because the kids aren’t adults yet. Nice, huh?
suitable age retires and goes on Social Security, his (or her with the help of science) MINOR CHILDREN are entitled to a check too?
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
I wasn’t aware of that -
I did say on my two ‘alternates’ possibly - with the ONLY reason being that at least the person who put into it had the opportunity to get something out of it.
Of course when the program was ‘invented’ only a handful of people lived much beyond 65 so, in essence, it was a ‘tax’ without the nasty label.....