Replies

blah blah blah

You and your ilk have been spinning for months now.

All I did was report what was said on FOX News.

So SS is a Ponzi scheme. Well, yes it is. Now, what is your point?

Never mind, I am tired of you.

As you have stated before, Governor Perry has no one to blame but himself for the message breakdown. While he MAY has said something about reforming SS in the debate is was so demonstrative in defending his use of the “Ponzi” term, that was the only memory the watcher was left with.

You and your ilk have been spinning for months now.

You're one of the biggest slimeballs on FR, you have no standing to lecture ANYONE on spin or methods.

So SS is a Ponzi scheme. Well, yes it is. Now, what is your point?

The point is obvious to anyone who isn't pimping Bachmann.

Bachmann's main selling point was that of being a principled conservative - the only real means of differentiating herself from someone like Perry (who I agree can be and has been an opportunist).

So what does she do with the Social Security issue? Because she smells a political opportunity, she is going to bash Perry for telling the truth about Social Security.

Which means she is as much an opportunist as Perry.

Bye-bye, Bachmann differentiation. Now she's just another opportunistic politician, albeit one with a thin resume and no executive experience.

So tell us again why we should consider voting for her over someone with a resume and executive experience?