Posted on 09/11/2011 3:08:54 PM PDT by RatherBiased.com
On this solemn commemorative day, we at NewsBusters have made a point of holding our rhetorical fire against liberals as a gesture of respect to those who lost their lives that day and subsequently. There is much we could say and, starting tomorrow, will say.
An exception has to be made though for one Paul Krugman, who seems, earlier life, to have been a decent and civilized person. Since he began writing a column for the New York Times, however, Krugman has experienced a veritable descent into madness, principally due to Bush Derangement Syndrome. Today, Krugman decided to proudly parade his madness for all the world to see in an execrable rant on his Times blog. [snip]
Please note the timestamp on this posting: September 11, 2011, 8:41 AM.
That means Krugman woke up on the tenth anniversary of the largest attack on this nation's homeland and decided to make an attack on three men forever linked to that moment, simply because he doesn't like them. Imagine if a New York Times columnist had done that during World War II on Pearl Harbor Day. Absolutely sickening.
Of course, one ought not be surprised to see such contemptible rhetoric from Krugman given his history of making numerous preposterous and hateful statements
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
The New York Times news and features offices are loaded with self-loathing homos and rage-filled, America-hating psychopaths.
Leni
Krugman also is proof that what they say, about liberalism being a mental illness, is true.
For the third time today, my response:
Paul Al-Krugman can kiss my royal Irish ass.
Krugman is a disgrace and of course, the New York Times is as much for publishing this vile screed from an individual who has clearly lost his mind.
Looks like my comment got pulled, oh well. LOL
Very funny!
Bfl
He won the Nobel Prize for attacking Bush; he doesn’t get many chances to prove he’s still up to it. Feel sorry for him, he’s bupkus, and you really never know whether it’s his trophy wife got up first and checked onto his blog.
Someday Krugman is going to get confused about which bushy end has the brain stem and he’ll drown himself in his own toilet.
Your emphasis is noted, Matthew. Go get your doggy treat.
BR> I dont see any difference here...
His remarks are beyond defending. When you think that he/Krugman could not come out any more hateful, here he goes, with this. Geez, President Bush was the CIC. He had to speak out about the attacks. Even if Bush had not been vocal, the hate would still be there. What a awful/sick comment on a day like today about any former president.
Rove was right.
"Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 in the attacks and prepared for war; liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers"
When will the calls go out from the NY Times et al, to work to understand why the TeaParty doesn't like liberals?
I think Krugman’s condition may be the result of long-term untreated syphilis.
He needs help. No joke.
That could be correct, albeit doubtful he actually got that close to a woman....
LOL
I doubt seriously he is confused.
Oh, I didn't mean to infer that Krugman contracted his syphilis from a woman.
You all know what I'd really like to see what Krugmann deserves. I'm from Chicago, use your imagination. The only thing I do know is that we have a Just God, and God is in Control.
Mr. Krugmann you are a worm, but one day, you will answer to the Creator...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.