[Lazamataz]

Laz, please don't ping freedomwarrior998 any more. Because he won't be able to respond to you. I don't think that is quite the solution freedomwarrior998 envisioned, but even implying a legal threat against another Freeper tends to have consequences to one's posting privileges. Oh, and freedomwarrior998 - you have a lot of nerve even raising that issue when you published Laz's name in the open forum last June. If anything, you got the zot for your utter hypocrisy.

Wow! Thanks man. Sometimes we do have to take people to task for views that are anti-freedom, and that's just not 'cyberstalking', that's just holding people accountable.

Like, for example, if I started posting all over Social Security threads saying how great it was, I would naturally expect posts from people who disagree with me on Social Security-related threads, saying "Defend this, commieboy".

If you check his history, he was a real not-nice guy, and that hurts the forum. You know.

BTW, I want to report that by taking Berlin_Freeper to task, and then by having a big showdown with him -- well, you will see, Berlin_Freeper isn't a rottenguy no mo', and he's actually becoming one of my favorite freepers. We disagree on cop issues but I bet we do so much more civilly. In fact -- I don't want to get maudlin -- but he and I are borderline becoming friends. :)

[Joe 6-pack]

"I don't want to get maudlin -- but he and I are borderline becoming friends. :)"

In time Laz, you may even find him hittable.

[the OlLine Rebel]

Darn. And I was literally just having a nice disagreement with fw on a Ryder Rental/Moslem thread. Who’da thought he’d be banned the next day?

[Gene Eric]

>> Berlin_Freeper isn’t a rottenguy

BF’s dogged opinions on impunity are offset by his good sense of humor.